CAJ | 학술논문

目的：观察刺络拔罐配合微波治疗顽固性网球肘疼痛改善程度和综合疗效。方法将72例符合纳入标准的患者,采用简单随机数字表法分为治疗组(刺络拔罐配合微波治疗,n=36)和对照组(电针配合微波治疗,n=36),用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)和《中医病证诊断疗效标准》相关疗效标准观察治疗前后患者疼痛改善程度和综合疗效。结果治疗组疼痛改善程度和综合疗效均明显优于对照组(P＜0.05)。结论刺络拔罐配合微波治疗顽固性网球肘,患者疼痛减轻程度和综合疗效有效提高。
목적：관찰자락발관배합미파치료완고성망구주동통개선정도화종합료효。방법장72례부합납입표준적환자,채용간단수궤수자표법분위치료조(자락발관배합미파치료,n=36)화대조조(전침배합미파치료,n=36),용시각모의평분법(VAS)화《중의병증진단료효표준》상관료효표준관찰치료전후환자동통개선정도화종합료효。결과치료조동통개선정도화종합료효균명현우우대조조(P＜0.05)。결론자락발관배합미파치료완고성망구주,환자동통감경정도화종합료효유효제고。
ObjectiveTo investigate the pain relieving degree and the comprehensive efficacy of pricking-cupping bloodletting plus microwave therapy in treating intractable tennis elbow.MethodSeventy-two patients meeting the inclusion criteria were randomly allocated, using a random number table, to a treatment group (pricking-cupping bloodletting plus microwave therapy,n=36) and a control group (electroacupuncture plus microwave therapy,n=36). The pain relieving degree and the overall therapeutic effect were assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and theCriteria of Syndrome Diagnosis and Therapeutic Effect in Traditional Chinese Medicinein the patients after treatment.ResultThe pain relieving degree and the overall therapeutic effect were more remarkable in the treatment group than in the control group (P<0.05).ConclusionPricking-cupping bloodletting plus microwave therapy can effectively heighten the pain relieving degree and the overall therapeutic effect in treating patients with intractable tennis elbow.