上海针灸杂志
上海針灸雜誌
상해침구잡지
SHANGHAI JOURNAL OF ACUPUNCTURE AND MOXIBUSTION
2015年
4期
362-363
,共2页
温针疗法%薰洗%足跟痛%足底筋膜炎
溫針療法%薰洗%足跟痛%足底觔膜炎
온침요법%훈세%족근통%족저근막염
Warm needling therapy%Fumigation%Heel pain%Plantar fasciitis
目的:观察温针灸配合中药薰洗治疗足底筋膜炎的临床疗效。方法将61例足底筋膜炎患者随机分为治疗组31例和对照组30例。治疗组采用温针灸配合中药薰洗治疗,对照组单纯采用温针灸治疗。结果治疗组总有效率和治愈率分别为100.0%和61.3%,对照组分别为96.7%和40.0%,两组总有效率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但是治疗组治愈率明显优于对照组,两组差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01)。两组治疗后VAS评分与治疗前比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01),提示两组均有较好的镇痛效果;治疗组治疗后 VAS 评分与对照组比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01),提示治疗组镇痛效果优于对照组。结论温针灸配合中药薰洗治疗足底筋膜炎疗效优于单纯温针灸治疗。
目的:觀察溫針灸配閤中藥薰洗治療足底觔膜炎的臨床療效。方法將61例足底觔膜炎患者隨機分為治療組31例和對照組30例。治療組採用溫針灸配閤中藥薰洗治療,對照組單純採用溫針灸治療。結果治療組總有效率和治愈率分彆為100.0%和61.3%,對照組分彆為96.7%和40.0%,兩組總有效率比較差異無統計學意義(P>0.05),但是治療組治愈率明顯優于對照組,兩組差異具有統計學意義(P<0.01)。兩組治療後VAS評分與治療前比較差異具有統計學意義(P<0.01),提示兩組均有較好的鎮痛效果;治療組治療後 VAS 評分與對照組比較差異具有統計學意義(P<0.01),提示治療組鎮痛效果優于對照組。結論溫針灸配閤中藥薰洗治療足底觔膜炎療效優于單純溫針灸治療。
목적:관찰온침구배합중약훈세치료족저근막염적림상료효。방법장61례족저근막염환자수궤분위치료조31례화대조조30례。치료조채용온침구배합중약훈세치료,대조조단순채용온침구치료。결과치료조총유효솔화치유솔분별위100.0%화61.3%,대조조분별위96.7%화40.0%,량조총유효솔비교차이무통계학의의(P>0.05),단시치료조치유솔명현우우대조조,량조차이구유통계학의의(P<0.01)。량조치료후VAS평분여치료전비교차이구유통계학의의(P<0.01),제시량조균유교호적진통효과;치료조치료후 VAS 평분여대조조비교차이구유통계학의의(P<0.01),제시치료조진통효과우우대조조。결론온침구배합중약훈세치료족저근막염료효우우단순온침구치료。
ObjectiveTo investigate the clinicalefficacy of warm needling plus Chinese herb fumigation in treating plantar fasciitis.MethodSixty-one patients with plantar fasciitis were randomly allocated to a treatment group of 31 cases and a control group of 30 cases. The treatment group receivedwarm needling plus Chinese herb fumigation and the control group, warm needling alone.ResultThe total efficacy rate and the cure rate were 100.0% and 61.3%, respectively, in the treatment group and 96.7%and 40.0%, respectively, in the control group. There was no statistically significant difference in the total efficacy rate between the two groups (P>0.05), but the cure rate was significantly higher in the treatment group than in the control group and there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05). There was a statistically significant pre-/post-treatment difference in the VAS score in the two groups (P<0.01), indicating that both the groups had a good analgesic effect. There was a statistically significant post-treatment difference in the VAS score between the treatment and control groups (P<0.01), indicating that theanalgesic effect was better in the treatment group than in the control group.ConclusionThe efficacy of warm needling plus Chinese herb fumigation is better than that of warm needling alone in treating plantar fasciitis.