临床医学工程
臨床醫學工程
림상의학공정
CLINICAL MEDICAL ENGINEERING
2015年
4期
422-423,426
,共3页
组织多普勒技术%先天性心脏%肺动脉压力%分级
組織多普勒技術%先天性心髒%肺動脈壓力%分級
조직다보륵기술%선천성심장%폐동맥압력%분급
Tissue Doppler imaging%Congenital heart%Pulmonary artery pressure%Classification
目的:研究组织多普勒技术对单纯先天性心脏病患者肺动脉压力及其分级的判断价值。方法选择2012年2月至2013年3月我院收治的先天性心脏病患者140例,按治疗先后顺序分为观察组和对照组各70例。对照组使用心导管术测量其肺动脉压力。观察组患者应用组织多普勒技术测量肺动脉血流频谱的时间间期参数、瓣膜返流速度和心内分流速度,估测患者肺动脉压力。观察对比两组患者的血流动力学参数,并观察记录两组患者肺动脉高压的分级情况。结果观察组患者右心房平均压、平均肺动脉压和肺动脉收缩压等血流动力学参数均显著高于对照组患者,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组中肺动脉高压患者所占比例为100.00%,高于对照组的85.71%,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论组织多普勒技术在对单纯先天性心脏病患者肺动脉压力及其分级的判断上有很良好的使用价值,值得推广。
目的:研究組織多普勒技術對單純先天性心髒病患者肺動脈壓力及其分級的判斷價值。方法選擇2012年2月至2013年3月我院收治的先天性心髒病患者140例,按治療先後順序分為觀察組和對照組各70例。對照組使用心導管術測量其肺動脈壓力。觀察組患者應用組織多普勒技術測量肺動脈血流頻譜的時間間期參數、瓣膜返流速度和心內分流速度,估測患者肺動脈壓力。觀察對比兩組患者的血流動力學參數,併觀察記錄兩組患者肺動脈高壓的分級情況。結果觀察組患者右心房平均壓、平均肺動脈壓和肺動脈收縮壓等血流動力學參數均顯著高于對照組患者,差異具有統計學意義(P<0.05);觀察組中肺動脈高壓患者所佔比例為100.00%,高于對照組的85.71%,但差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。結論組織多普勒技術在對單純先天性心髒病患者肺動脈壓力及其分級的判斷上有很良好的使用價值,值得推廣。
목적:연구조직다보륵기술대단순선천성심장병환자폐동맥압력급기분급적판단개치。방법선택2012년2월지2013년3월아원수치적선천성심장병환자140례,안치료선후순서분위관찰조화대조조각70례。대조조사용심도관술측량기폐동맥압력。관찰조환자응용조직다보륵기술측량폐동맥혈류빈보적시간간기삼수、판막반류속도화심내분류속도,고측환자폐동맥압력。관찰대비량조환자적혈류동역학삼수,병관찰기록량조환자폐동맥고압적분급정황。결과관찰조환자우심방평균압、평균폐동맥압화폐동맥수축압등혈류동역학삼수균현저고우대조조환자,차이구유통계학의의(P<0.05);관찰조중폐동맥고압환자소점비례위100.00%,고우대조조적85.71%,단차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。결론조직다보륵기술재대단순선천성심장병환자폐동맥압력급기분급적판단상유흔량호적사용개치,치득추엄。
Objective To study the value of tissue Doppler imaging in pulmonary arterial pressure and its classification of patients with simple congenital heart disease (CHD). Methods 140 CHD patients treated in our hospital from February 2012 to March 2013 were selected and divided into observation group and control group according to treatment order, with 70 cases in each group. The control group was given cardiac catheterization to measure the pulmonary arterial pressure, the observation group was given tissue Doppler imaging to measure the time period parameter of blood spectrum, speed of valvular regurgitation and intracardiac shunt, so as to measure patients' pulmonary arterial pressure. The hemodynamic parameters and classification of pulmonary arterial hypertension between two groups were observed and recorded. Results The hemodynamic parameters (including RAMP, MPAP and PASP) of observation group were significantly higher than those of control group, with statistical difference (P <0.05); the proportion of pulmonary arterial hypertension in observation group was 100.00%, higher than 85.71% in control group, but the difference was not statistical (P >0.05). Conclusions Tissue Doppler technology has good value in pulmonary artery pressure and its classification of patients with simple congenital heart disease, which is worthy of promotion.