临床医学工程
臨床醫學工程
림상의학공정
CLINICAL MEDICAL ENGINEERING
2015年
4期
518-519,522
,共3页
输液贴%安普贴%压疮%临床效果
輸液貼%安普貼%壓瘡%臨床效果
수액첩%안보첩%압창%림상효과
Infusion paster%Algoplaque%Pressure sore%Clinical effect
目的:确保安普贴治疗压疮效果的前提下,探讨联合使用输液贴与安普贴对压疮患者的临床效果。方法选取2014年4月至2014年10月来我院治疗的脑血管病合并压疮(Ⅰ~Ⅲ期)患者40例为研究对象,将患者随机分为观察组和对照组各20例。对照组患者常规使用安普贴处理压疮,观察组患者联合使用安普贴和输液贴处理压疮。比较两组患者治疗效果,并观察记录两组安普贴的更换时间和次数。结果观察组和对照组的治疗有效率均为100.0豫,相比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组安普贴的换贴时间为(3.17±0.73)凿,显著长于对照组的(1.92±0.46)凿,非伤口原因导致的换贴次数为5次(16.7豫),显著少于对照组的16次(28.1豫);差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论输液贴与安普贴的联合使用方法可以确保安普贴对压疮的治疗效果,也可以有效减少不必要的安普贴更换次数,有益于患者,值得推荐使用。
目的:確保安普貼治療壓瘡效果的前提下,探討聯閤使用輸液貼與安普貼對壓瘡患者的臨床效果。方法選取2014年4月至2014年10月來我院治療的腦血管病閤併壓瘡(Ⅰ~Ⅲ期)患者40例為研究對象,將患者隨機分為觀察組和對照組各20例。對照組患者常規使用安普貼處理壓瘡,觀察組患者聯閤使用安普貼和輸液貼處理壓瘡。比較兩組患者治療效果,併觀察記錄兩組安普貼的更換時間和次數。結果觀察組和對照組的治療有效率均為100.0豫,相比差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。觀察組安普貼的換貼時間為(3.17±0.73)鑿,顯著長于對照組的(1.92±0.46)鑿,非傷口原因導緻的換貼次數為5次(16.7豫),顯著少于對照組的16次(28.1豫);差異均具有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論輸液貼與安普貼的聯閤使用方法可以確保安普貼對壓瘡的治療效果,也可以有效減少不必要的安普貼更換次數,有益于患者,值得推薦使用。
목적:학보안보첩치료압창효과적전제하,탐토연합사용수액첩여안보첩대압창환자적림상효과。방법선취2014년4월지2014년10월래아원치료적뇌혈관병합병압창(Ⅰ~Ⅲ기)환자40례위연구대상,장환자수궤분위관찰조화대조조각20례。대조조환자상규사용안보첩처리압창,관찰조환자연합사용안보첩화수액첩처리압창。비교량조환자치료효과,병관찰기록량조안보첩적경환시간화차수。결과관찰조화대조조적치료유효솔균위100.0예,상비차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。관찰조안보첩적환첩시간위(3.17±0.73)착,현저장우대조조적(1.92±0.46)착,비상구원인도치적환첩차수위5차(16.7예),현저소우대조조적16차(28.1예);차이균구유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론수액첩여안보첩적연합사용방법가이학보안보첩대압창적치료효과,야가이유효감소불필요적안보첩경환차수,유익우환자,치득추천사용。
Objective To investigate the clinical effect of infusion paster combined with algoplaque in treating pressure sore under the premise of the effect of treating pressure sore with algoplaque. Methods 40 patients with pressure sore (Ⅰ~ Ⅲstage) complicating cerebrovascular disease treated in our hospital from April 2014 to October 2014 were selected and randomly divided into observation group and control group, with 20 cases in each group. The control group was given algoplaque to treat pressure sore, the observation group received algoplaque combined with infusion paster. The clinical effect of the two groups was compared, the replacement time and replacement times of algoplaque in the two groups were recorded. Results Both the effective rate of the observation group and the control group was 100.0%, and the difference was not statistical (P>0.05). The algoplaque replacement time of the observation group was (3.17±0.73) d, significantly longer than (1.92±0.46) d of the control group;the replacement times resulted from non-wound of the observation group was 5 times (16.7%), significantly less than 16 times (28.1%) of the control group; all the difference was statistical (P <0.05). Conclusions Infusion paster combined with algoplaque can ensure the treatment effect of algoplaque on pressure sore, and can effectively reduce the unnecessary replacement times, which is beneficial for patients and deserves application.