农业环境科学学报
農業環境科學學報
농업배경과학학보
Journal of Agro-Environment Science
2015年
4期
613-618
,共6页
王玉军%陈能场%刘存%王兴祥%周东美%王慎强%陈怀满
王玉軍%陳能場%劉存%王興祥%週東美%王慎彊%陳懷滿
왕옥군%진능장%류존%왕흥상%주동미%왕신강%진부만
重金属%土壤负载容量%管控法%2015国际土壤年
重金屬%土壤負載容量%管控法%2015國際土壤年
중금속%토양부재용량%관공법%2015국제토양년
heavy metals%loading capacity of soil%management and control method of pollution%IYS 2015
土壤重金属负载容量管控法是指在土壤环境质量保护和农产品清洁生产过程中土壤重金属负载容量的全过程监测和控制方法。本文重点讨论了管控的必要性和可能性,强调了法律依托的重要性,即管控的合法性。它与标准管理法的差别在于(1)标准管理法为单一数值的终端控制,而负载容量管控法为立体的、全方位的过程控制;(2)标准管理法为浓度控制,而负载容量管控法为总量控制;(3)标准管理法责任主体不够明确,具有较大的被动性和依赖性;而负载容量管控法具有责任主体的主观能动性,即使在无法获得统一标准的情况下都不影响土壤重金属污染的防控;(4)标准可能会产生保护不足和过保护的情况;而负载容量管控法能够较好地发挥“土宜学”的精髓,充分发挥土壤生产力;(5)标准管理法重金属赋值过于“统一”,缺乏个性化;而负载容量管控法针对特定对象,有其自身的临界值,可保障农产品安全。文章对土壤重金属负载容量管控法的特点和优势进行了较为详细的讨论,它可作为相关标准的有益补充,亦可在法律认可的前提下作为土壤污染防治的有效替代方法。
土壤重金屬負載容量管控法是指在土壤環境質量保護和農產品清潔生產過程中土壤重金屬負載容量的全過程鑑測和控製方法。本文重點討論瞭管控的必要性和可能性,彊調瞭法律依託的重要性,即管控的閤法性。它與標準管理法的差彆在于(1)標準管理法為單一數值的終耑控製,而負載容量管控法為立體的、全方位的過程控製;(2)標準管理法為濃度控製,而負載容量管控法為總量控製;(3)標準管理法責任主體不夠明確,具有較大的被動性和依賴性;而負載容量管控法具有責任主體的主觀能動性,即使在無法穫得統一標準的情況下都不影響土壤重金屬汙染的防控;(4)標準可能會產生保護不足和過保護的情況;而負載容量管控法能夠較好地髮揮“土宜學”的精髓,充分髮揮土壤生產力;(5)標準管理法重金屬賦值過于“統一”,缺乏箇性化;而負載容量管控法針對特定對象,有其自身的臨界值,可保障農產品安全。文章對土壤重金屬負載容量管控法的特點和優勢進行瞭較為詳細的討論,它可作為相關標準的有益補充,亦可在法律認可的前提下作為土壤汙染防治的有效替代方法。
토양중금속부재용량관공법시지재토양배경질량보호화농산품청길생산과정중토양중금속부재용량적전과정감측화공제방법。본문중점토론료관공적필요성화가능성,강조료법률의탁적중요성,즉관공적합법성。타여표준관리법적차별재우(1)표준관리법위단일수치적종단공제,이부재용량관공법위입체적、전방위적과정공제;(2)표준관리법위농도공제,이부재용량관공법위총량공제;(3)표준관리법책임주체불구명학,구유교대적피동성화의뢰성;이부재용량관공법구유책임주체적주관능동성,즉사재무법획득통일표준적정황하도불영향토양중금속오염적방공;(4)표준가능회산생보호불족화과보호적정황;이부재용량관공법능구교호지발휘“토의학”적정수,충분발휘토양생산력;(5)표준관리법중금속부치과우“통일”,결핍개성화;이부재용량관공법침대특정대상,유기자신적림계치,가보장농산품안전。문장대토양중금속부재용량관공법적특점화우세진행료교위상세적토론,타가작위상관표준적유익보충,역가재법률인가적전제하작위토양오염방치적유효체대방법。
We would like to dedicate this paper to 2015 the International Year of Soil. Monitoring and control methods for the quality and the safety of soil environment and agricultural products based on loading capacity of soil for heavy metals were essentially a set of measures of cleaner production during entire process of farmland management. The method can reduce or avoid the negative effects of heavy metals on soil and crops. This article focuses on the necessity and possibility of the monitoring and control methods based loading capacity of soil for pollu-tion management and control, emphasizing the importance of the legal backing, namely the legitimacy of the method. The differences between the loading capacity-based methods and the traditional management approaches based on environmental standards are(1)The environmen-tal standard-based management only controls a single numerical endpoint;the loading capacity control method is three-dimensional, control-ling the full range of processes.(2)The environmental standard-based management is concentration control;the loading capacity-based method is total amount control of pollutants.(3)The subject of liability in the environmental standard-based management is not clarified, led to great passive dependence on the authorities;the loading capacity-based method takes the initiative for differentiating the main responsibility will not affect the prevention and control of heavy metal pollutions whether the uniform criteria established or not.(4)The environmental standard-based management may cause inadequate control or over-protection in certain circumstances;the loading capacity-based method adopts the essence of"Land Suitability Science"and fully utilizes the soil productivity.(5)The criteria assignment of heavy metals in the environmental standard-based management is too "unified", without considering the specialities of regional environments; the loading capacity-based method supplies the critical levels for each particular region, aiming at the protection of the safety of agricultural products. The characteristics and advantages of the control methods based the loading capacity of soil are discussed in detail. It can be used as a beneficial supplement to the standards and as a substitute under the premise of the legal recognition for effective prevention and control of soil pollution.