中国基层医药
中國基層醫藥
중국기층의약
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PRIMARY MEDICINE AND PHARMACY
2015年
7期
1014-1017
,共4页
精神分裂症%抑郁%齐拉西酮%奥氮平%脂代谢
精神分裂癥%抑鬱%齊拉西酮%奧氮平%脂代謝
정신분렬증%억욱%제랍서동%오담평%지대사
Schizophrenia%Depressive symptoms%Ziprasidone%Olanzapine%Lipid metabolism
目的:探讨齐拉西酮联合小剂量奥氮平治疗伴抑郁症状精神分裂症的疗效及其对脂代谢的影响。方法将104例伴抑郁症状的精神分裂症患者按照随机数字表法随机分为两组,治疗组(n=54例)给予奥氮平,起始剂量为2.5 mg/d,1周内加至5~10 mg/d;齐拉西酮起始剂量为40 mg/d,2周内加至120~160 mg/d。对照组(n=54例)给予奥氮平,起始剂量为5 mg/d,2周内加至10~20 mg/d;疗程为8周。比较分析两组PANSS总分、HAMD评分,肥胖、血脂等指标变化及不良反应。结果治疗后,治疗组与对照组PANSS总分[(40.19±9.23)比(59.29±10.14)]、HAMD评分[(8.58±3.16)比(12.19±4.04)]均较治疗前显著降低(t=9.41、4.91、6.51、5.20,均P<0.05),而治疗组下降更为明显(t=5.11、3.01,均P<0.05);与治疗前比较,对照组治疗后腰围(83.45±5.29)cm、BMI(26.95±2.53)kg/m2均明显升高(t=5.14、3.18,均P<0.05),且治疗组治疗后腰围(77.86±3.70)cm、BMI(23.76±2.55)kg/m2均显著低于对照组(t=5.38、4.53,均P<0.05);与治疗前比较,对照组 TC(6.54±0.86)mmol/L、TG(2.26±0.83)mmol/L、LDL-C(3.94± 0.43)mmol/L均明显升高,HDL-C(1.02±0.18)mmol/L明显降低,治疗组TC(5.35±0.58)mmol/L明显升高(t=4.20、3.27、3.91、2.97、4.47,均P<0.05);治疗组治疗后血脂水平均显著优于对照组(t=3.18、3.01、2.76、2.87,均P<0.05);治疗组TESS评分(3.35±0.57)分,显著低于对照组的(4.93±1.03)分(t=3.98, P<0.05)。结论齐拉西酮联合小剂量奥氮平治疗伴有抑郁症状的精神分裂症,可有效缓解抑郁症状,且对体质量及血脂代谢的影响小,不良反应少。
目的:探討齊拉西酮聯閤小劑量奧氮平治療伴抑鬱癥狀精神分裂癥的療效及其對脂代謝的影響。方法將104例伴抑鬱癥狀的精神分裂癥患者按照隨機數字錶法隨機分為兩組,治療組(n=54例)給予奧氮平,起始劑量為2.5 mg/d,1週內加至5~10 mg/d;齊拉西酮起始劑量為40 mg/d,2週內加至120~160 mg/d。對照組(n=54例)給予奧氮平,起始劑量為5 mg/d,2週內加至10~20 mg/d;療程為8週。比較分析兩組PANSS總分、HAMD評分,肥胖、血脂等指標變化及不良反應。結果治療後,治療組與對照組PANSS總分[(40.19±9.23)比(59.29±10.14)]、HAMD評分[(8.58±3.16)比(12.19±4.04)]均較治療前顯著降低(t=9.41、4.91、6.51、5.20,均P<0.05),而治療組下降更為明顯(t=5.11、3.01,均P<0.05);與治療前比較,對照組治療後腰圍(83.45±5.29)cm、BMI(26.95±2.53)kg/m2均明顯升高(t=5.14、3.18,均P<0.05),且治療組治療後腰圍(77.86±3.70)cm、BMI(23.76±2.55)kg/m2均顯著低于對照組(t=5.38、4.53,均P<0.05);與治療前比較,對照組 TC(6.54±0.86)mmol/L、TG(2.26±0.83)mmol/L、LDL-C(3.94± 0.43)mmol/L均明顯升高,HDL-C(1.02±0.18)mmol/L明顯降低,治療組TC(5.35±0.58)mmol/L明顯升高(t=4.20、3.27、3.91、2.97、4.47,均P<0.05);治療組治療後血脂水平均顯著優于對照組(t=3.18、3.01、2.76、2.87,均P<0.05);治療組TESS評分(3.35±0.57)分,顯著低于對照組的(4.93±1.03)分(t=3.98, P<0.05)。結論齊拉西酮聯閤小劑量奧氮平治療伴有抑鬱癥狀的精神分裂癥,可有效緩解抑鬱癥狀,且對體質量及血脂代謝的影響小,不良反應少。
목적:탐토제랍서동연합소제량오담평치료반억욱증상정신분렬증적료효급기대지대사적영향。방법장104례반억욱증상적정신분렬증환자안조수궤수자표법수궤분위량조,치료조(n=54례)급여오담평,기시제량위2.5 mg/d,1주내가지5~10 mg/d;제랍서동기시제량위40 mg/d,2주내가지120~160 mg/d。대조조(n=54례)급여오담평,기시제량위5 mg/d,2주내가지10~20 mg/d;료정위8주。비교분석량조PANSS총분、HAMD평분,비반、혈지등지표변화급불량반응。결과치료후,치료조여대조조PANSS총분[(40.19±9.23)비(59.29±10.14)]、HAMD평분[(8.58±3.16)비(12.19±4.04)]균교치료전현저강저(t=9.41、4.91、6.51、5.20,균P<0.05),이치료조하강경위명현(t=5.11、3.01,균P<0.05);여치료전비교,대조조치료후요위(83.45±5.29)cm、BMI(26.95±2.53)kg/m2균명현승고(t=5.14、3.18,균P<0.05),차치료조치료후요위(77.86±3.70)cm、BMI(23.76±2.55)kg/m2균현저저우대조조(t=5.38、4.53,균P<0.05);여치료전비교,대조조 TC(6.54±0.86)mmol/L、TG(2.26±0.83)mmol/L、LDL-C(3.94± 0.43)mmol/L균명현승고,HDL-C(1.02±0.18)mmol/L명현강저,치료조TC(5.35±0.58)mmol/L명현승고(t=4.20、3.27、3.91、2.97、4.47,균P<0.05);치료조치료후혈지수평균현저우우대조조(t=3.18、3.01、2.76、2.87,균P<0.05);치료조TESS평분(3.35±0.57)분,현저저우대조조적(4.93±1.03)분(t=3.98, P<0.05)。결론제랍서동연합소제량오담평치료반유억욱증상적정신분렬증,가유효완해억욱증상,차대체질량급혈지대사적영향소,불량반응소。
Objective To explore the effect of ziprasidone combined with low dose of olanzapine in the treat-ment of schizophrenia with depressive symptoms,and its lipid metabolism.Methods According to the digital table, 108 schizophrenia patients with depressive symptoms were randomly divided into the two groups.The treatment group (n=54)was given starting doses of ziprasidone with 2.5mg/d,increased to 5 -10 mg/d for 1 week.And starting doses of olanzapine with 40mg/d,increased to 120 -160mg/d for 2 weeks.The control group (n=54)was given starting doses of olanzapine with 5mg/d,increased to 10-20mg/d for 2 weeks.The treatment course was 8 weeks.The PANSS score and HAMD score,indicators of obesity and blood lipid and adverse effect were observed.Results The PANSS score and HAMD score in the treatment group[(40.19 ±9.23)vs (59.29 ±10.14)]and the control group [(8.58 ±3.16)vs (12.19 ±4.04)]were significantly lower than those before treatment(t=9.41,4.91,6.51, 5.20,all P<0.05),and the scores in the treatment group were reduced more remarkably(t=5.11,3.01,all P<0.05).The waistline(83.45 ±5.29)cm,BMI(26.95 ±2.53)kg/m2,WHR(23.76 ±2.55)cm in the control group were all increased compared with those before treatment(t=5.14,3.18,all P<0.05)while the indicators[(23.76 ± 2.55)vs (23.76 ±2.55)]above improved more remarkably in the treatment group than those in the control group (t=5.38,4.53,all P<0.05).Compared with before treatment,the level of TC (6.54 ±0.86)mmol/L,TG(2.26 ± 0.83)mmol/L,LDL-C(3.94 ±0.43)mmol/L were increased remarkably,and HDL-C(1.02 ±0.18)mmol/L was reduced in the control group,TC(5.35 ±0.58)mmol/L in treatment group in the treatment group (t=4.20,3.27, 3.91,2.97,4.47,all P<0.05),while the indicators of blood lipid in the treatment group were better than those in the control group (t=3.18,3.01,2.76,2.87,all P<0.05).The TESS score in the treatment group(3.35 ± 0.57)point was lower than that in the control group(4.93 ±1.03)point (t=3.98,P<0.05).Conclusion It is effective and safe of combined with low dose of olanzapine in the treatment of schizophrenia with depressive symp-toms,which can contribute to effectively alleviate symptoms of depression with low effect on body weight and blood lip-id metabolism,less adverse reaction.