宜宾学院学报
宜賓學院學報
의빈학원학보
JOURNAL OF YIBIN UNIVERSITY
2015年
3期
49-58
,共10页
立法者原意解释%携带凶器盗窃%适用流程%生命%身体法益
立法者原意解釋%攜帶兇器盜竊%適用流程%生命%身體法益
입법자원의해석%휴대흉기도절%괄용류정%생명%신체법익
interpretation of legislatorial original meaning%stealing with weapon%procedure of application%the legal interest of life or body
《刑法修正案（八）》增设的“携带凶器盗窃”由于法条的简略性，适用时凶器的认定、行为人对凶器的认识、行为人应否具备“使用凶器”的目的，以及行为人“使用凶器”的目的种类不一时如何处理这四个关键点，影响了行为人之行为的认定，有悖于刑法的“体系思维”。立法者应以“携带凶器盗窃”的立法目的———保护人的生命、身体法益———为立足点，紧扣这四个关键点按从客观到主观的认定顺序，创制该法条的适用流程，使其条文说明中展示出的限制解释与谦抑性刑事政策的立场相一致。
《刑法脩正案（八）》增設的“攜帶兇器盜竊”由于法條的簡略性，適用時兇器的認定、行為人對兇器的認識、行為人應否具備“使用兇器”的目的，以及行為人“使用兇器”的目的種類不一時如何處理這四箇關鍵點，影響瞭行為人之行為的認定，有悖于刑法的“體繫思維”。立法者應以“攜帶兇器盜竊”的立法目的———保護人的生命、身體法益———為立足點，緊釦這四箇關鍵點按從客觀到主觀的認定順序，創製該法條的適用流程，使其條文說明中展示齣的限製解釋與謙抑性刑事政策的立場相一緻。
《형법수정안（팔）》증설적“휴대흉기도절”유우법조적간략성，괄용시흉기적인정、행위인대흉기적인식、행위인응부구비“사용흉기”적목적，이급행위인“사용흉기”적목적충류불일시여하처리저사개관건점，영향료행위인지행위적인정，유패우형법적“체계사유”。입법자응이“휴대흉기도절”적입법목적———보호인적생명、신체법익———위립족점，긴구저사개관건점안종객관도주관적인정순서，창제해법조적괄용류정，사기조문설명중전시출적한제해석여겸억성형사정책적립장상일치。
The briefness of The Eighth Amendment of Criminal Law on this specific crime leads to a difficulty in the determination of the nature of the crime .To consider a conductor ’ s conduct to be“stealing with weap-on”, the following factors should be accounted for:firstly, this tool must be thought of as a weapon , which should be based on the condition that a conductor knows this tool has an objective danger of harming and killing people;secondly, the conductor should have the intention of using the weapon;lastly,“stealing with weapon”can be applied when a conductor ’ s aim of using a weapon is to harm people ’ s legal interest of life and body .Therefore , legislators should , by taking into account the above mentioned factors , legislate on the procedure of application of “stealing with weapon” to meet the legislatorial original meaning of protecting the legal interests of life and body and seek consistency between the restrictive explanation and modest character of criminal law .
