农业工程学报
農業工程學報
농업공정학보
2015年
7期
33-38
,共6页
张银平%杜瑞成%刁培松%耿端阳
張銀平%杜瑞成%刁培鬆%耿耑暘
장은평%두서성%조배송%경단양
作物%机械化%土壤水分%生态沃土%耕作模式%土壤有机质%容重%产量
作物%機械化%土壤水分%生態沃土%耕作模式%土壤有機質%容重%產量
작물%궤계화%토양수분%생태옥토%경작모식%토양유궤질%용중%산량
crops%mechanization%soil moisture%ecologically enrich soil%soil organic%bulk density%yields
为了解决小麦玉米两作区连年翻耕造成的土壤养分、水分流失、土壤沙化以及长期不耕作不利于作物高产等问题,将翻耕、旋耕、深松等适当结合,建立一种械化生态沃土耕作模式,设置一定的周期,周期内对土壤进行适度的耕作,并与连年翻耕和连年免耕模式进行试验对比。试验结果表明:5a周期内机械化生态沃土耕作模式可以显著提高各层土壤有机质含量,0~10 cm提高最大达0.2%;连年免耕在前3 a可以显著提高0~10 cm土壤有机质含量,后2 a有所减少;连年翻耕在前3a可以显著提高>20~30 cm土壤有机质含量,后2a显著减少。土壤含水率表现为机械化生态沃土>连年免耕>连年翻耕,随着时间变化,差异越来越显著。0~10 cm土壤容重在5%水平上机械化生态沃土耕作模式和连年免耕显著低于连年翻耕。机械化生态沃土耕作模式下作物产量显著高于连年免耕和连年翻耕,2014年增产优势最明显,比连年翻耕小麦增产30.8%,玉米增产28.4%,比连年免耕小麦增产22.5%,玉米增产20.9%。
為瞭解決小麥玉米兩作區連年翻耕造成的土壤養分、水分流失、土壤沙化以及長期不耕作不利于作物高產等問題,將翻耕、鏇耕、深鬆等適噹結閤,建立一種械化生態沃土耕作模式,設置一定的週期,週期內對土壤進行適度的耕作,併與連年翻耕和連年免耕模式進行試驗對比。試驗結果錶明:5a週期內機械化生態沃土耕作模式可以顯著提高各層土壤有機質含量,0~10 cm提高最大達0.2%;連年免耕在前3 a可以顯著提高0~10 cm土壤有機質含量,後2 a有所減少;連年翻耕在前3a可以顯著提高>20~30 cm土壤有機質含量,後2a顯著減少。土壤含水率錶現為機械化生態沃土>連年免耕>連年翻耕,隨著時間變化,差異越來越顯著。0~10 cm土壤容重在5%水平上機械化生態沃土耕作模式和連年免耕顯著低于連年翻耕。機械化生態沃土耕作模式下作物產量顯著高于連年免耕和連年翻耕,2014年增產優勢最明顯,比連年翻耕小麥增產30.8%,玉米增產28.4%,比連年免耕小麥增產22.5%,玉米增產20.9%。
위료해결소맥옥미량작구련년번경조성적토양양분、수분류실、토양사화이급장기불경작불리우작물고산등문제,장번경、선경、심송등괄당결합,건립일충계화생태옥토경작모식,설치일정적주기,주기내대토양진행괄도적경작,병여련년번경화련년면경모식진행시험대비。시험결과표명:5a주기내궤계화생태옥토경작모식가이현저제고각층토양유궤질함량,0~10 cm제고최대체0.2%;련년면경재전3 a가이현저제고0~10 cm토양유궤질함량,후2 a유소감소;련년번경재전3a가이현저제고>20~30 cm토양유궤질함량,후2a현저감소。토양함수솔표현위궤계화생태옥토>련년면경>련년번경,수착시간변화,차이월래월현저。0~10 cm토양용중재5%수평상궤계화생태옥토경작모식화련년면경현저저우련년번경。궤계화생태옥토경작모식하작물산량현저고우련년면경화련년번경,2014년증산우세최명현,비련년번경소맥증산30.8%,옥미증산28.4%,비련년면경소맥증산22.5%,옥미증산20.9%。
Tillage was the key factor affecting soil quality, and plowing, rotary tillage and subsoiling etc. were the important links of tillage pattern. Years of plowing, trying to make the soil crushing and creating a good growth environment were the essence of traditional farming in China. But excessive tillage caused the damage to the vegetation, made the soil lose protection, caused soil erosion, dust wreaking havoc and fertility decline in the end. However, long-term no tillage was also inconducive to the sustainable high yield of crops. In order to solve this problem, through comprehensive consideration, the advantages of different tillage patterns were took and combined reasonably. Then a rotational period of mechanical and ecological tillage pattern was established in wheat/corn double-cropping system and compared with the patterns of years of plowing and years of no tillage. The mechanical and ecological tillage pattern was set as Treatment W, the years of plowing pattern was Treatment F, and the years of no tillage pattern was Treatment N. The rotational period was set to be 5 years. For Treatment W, different agricultural machines were combined suitably for moderate tillage on soil in the 5 years. In the first year, the soil was ploughed with the splintery straw mulch on the soil after harvesting corn, and no tillage the next year;in the third and the fourth year subsoil interleaved, and in the last year no tillage as well. For Treatment F the soil was ploughed every year after harvesting corn and no tillage for Treatment N. In order to study the effects of different patterns on soil and yield, the soils of 0-10, >10-20, >20-30 cm layer were collected and tested for soil organic content, moisture content and bulk density, and yields of wheat and corn were recorded as well every year in the period for all treatments. Then the results were compared. The comparison results showed as follows:in the period of five-year test, Treatment W effectively improved soil organic content at all 3 layers, and the largest improvement was 0.2% at 0-10 cm soil layer; Treatment N also significantly improved soil organic content at 0-10 cm soil layer at the first 3 years, but reduced at the last 2 years; however, soil organic content was reduced for Treatment F at 0-10 cm layer, yet that at>20-30 cm soil layer was significantly improved at the first 3 years, and then reduced at the last 2 years. The soil moisture contents from the highest to the lowest were Treatment W, Treatment N and Treatment F, and the difference between Treatment W and the two other treatments was more significant (P<0.05) with the increasing of the year. At 0-10 cm soil layer, the soil bulk densities of Treatment W and N were significantly lower than Treatment F at 5%level. The yields of Treatment W and N were significantly higher than Treatment F, and the order from the highest to the lowest was Treatment W, Treatment N and Treatment F;the difference was most significant in 2014, wheat yields of Treatment W was 30.8% higher than Treatment F and 22.5% than Treatment N, and yields of corn was 28.4%higher than Treatment F and 20.9%than Treatment N.