CAJ | 학술논문

目的：比较电灼术、骚刮术和修剪术治疗腋臭的疗效。方法收集骚刮术、电灼术、修剪术3种术式的病例197例，比较各术式的疗效。结果修剪术组总有效率明显高于电灼术组和骚刮术组，差异有统计学意义（P <0.05）。修剪术组的并发症发生率明显低于电灼术组和骚刮术组，差异具有统计学意义（ P <0.05）。结论与骚刮术和电灼术相比，大汗腺修剪术创伤小且美观，直视下修剪大汗腺，操作简便、可靠、根治率高。
목적：비교전작술、소괄술화수전술치료액취적료효。방법수집소괄술、전작술、수전술3충술식적병례197례，비교각술식적료효。결과수전술조총유효솔명현고우전작술조화소괄술조，차이유통계학의의（P <0.05）。수전술조적병발증발생솔명현저우전작술조화소괄술조，차이구유통계학의의（ P <0.05）。결론여소괄술화전작술상비，대한선수전술창상소차미관，직시하수전대한선，조작간편、가고、근치솔고。
Objective To compare effectiveness of cauterization,Sao craping operation and subdermal curettage in the treatment of bromhidrosis. Methods 197 patients underwent cauterization,Sao craping operation and subder-mal curettage were collected. Efficacy of the three surgeries was compared. Results Total effective rate of subdermal curettage was significantly higher than the other two surgeries(P < 0. 05). Complication rate of subdermal curettage was significantly lower than the other two surgeries(P < 0. 05). Conclusion Subdermal curettage has the advantages of less trauma,beautiful incision and under direct vision with easy operation and high cure rate.