CAJ | 학술논문

自实施执业医师资格考试以来，其通过标准的设定方法一直备受争议。本研究介绍Angoff法、Modified Angoff法、Nedelsky法、Borderline Group法四种当今国内外比较常用的方法，概述其优缺点及其在各国执业医师资格考试通过标准设定过程中的使用情况，以期为中国的执业医师资格考试合格分数线的设定提供借鉴和参考。
자실시집업의사자격고시이래，기통과표준적설정방법일직비수쟁의。본연구개소Angoff법、Modified Angoff법、Nedelsky법、Borderline Group법사충당금국내외비교상용적방법，개술기우결점급기재각국집업의사자격고시통과표준설정과정중적사용정황，이기위중국적집업의사자격고시합격분수선적설정제공차감화삼고。
Since the examination of doctor's qualifications came into effect, methods that are set by standard to judge whether one passes the examination or not were in dispute all the while. This article is going to introduce four kinds of methods (Angoff method、Modified Angoff method、Nedelsky method、Borderline group method) which are commonly used at home and abroad. Summarizing their advantages, disadvantages and the usage in the process of standards setting in various countries, we aim to provide reference for setting cutoff score of the examination of doctor's qualifications in China.