中华医学教育探索杂志
中華醫學教育探索雜誌
중화의학교육탐색잡지
Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research
2015年
3期
272-275
,共4页
王巧云%董晓青%杨静%李金莲%李娜
王巧雲%董曉青%楊靜%李金蓮%李娜
왕교운%동효청%양정%리금련%리나
案例教学%机能实验学%教学法
案例教學%機能實驗學%教學法
안례교학%궤능실험학%교학법
Case-based learning%Functional experiment%Teaching method
目的:探讨以案例为主线的教学在机能实验学中的教学效果。方法选择2011级五年制临床医学专业139名学生为研究对象,随机分为对照组(n=70)和案例组(n=69)。对照组采用传统教学,案例组采用以案例为主线的教学,即将临床案例引入教学,通过案例导入、问题设置以及文献查阅和讨论等环节完成教学过程。教学结束后,以考试成绩分析和问卷调查评价教学效果。采用t检验和字2检验进行统计分析。结果案例组学生的操作考试得分优于对照组(P=0.0420),并且案例组的总得分及闭卷考试得分也优于对照组(P值分别为0.0078和0.0082)。问卷调查显示:80%以上的学生认为以案例为主线的教学能够提高学习兴趣、自主学习能力、分析和解决问题能力以及知识应用等能力。结论以案例为主线的教学对提高学生的学习成绩及综合能力优于传统教学。
目的:探討以案例為主線的教學在機能實驗學中的教學效果。方法選擇2011級五年製臨床醫學專業139名學生為研究對象,隨機分為對照組(n=70)和案例組(n=69)。對照組採用傳統教學,案例組採用以案例為主線的教學,即將臨床案例引入教學,通過案例導入、問題設置以及文獻查閱和討論等環節完成教學過程。教學結束後,以攷試成績分析和問捲調查評價教學效果。採用t檢驗和字2檢驗進行統計分析。結果案例組學生的操作攷試得分優于對照組(P=0.0420),併且案例組的總得分及閉捲攷試得分也優于對照組(P值分彆為0.0078和0.0082)。問捲調查顯示:80%以上的學生認為以案例為主線的教學能夠提高學習興趣、自主學習能力、分析和解決問題能力以及知識應用等能力。結論以案例為主線的教學對提高學生的學習成績及綜閤能力優于傳統教學。
목적:탐토이안례위주선적교학재궤능실험학중적교학효과。방법선택2011급오년제림상의학전업139명학생위연구대상,수궤분위대조조(n=70)화안례조(n=69)。대조조채용전통교학,안례조채용이안례위주선적교학,즉장림상안례인입교학,통과안례도입、문제설치이급문헌사열화토론등배절완성교학과정。교학결속후,이고시성적분석화문권조사평개교학효과。채용t검험화자2검험진행통계분석。결과안례조학생적조작고시득분우우대조조(P=0.0420),병차안례조적총득분급폐권고시득분야우우대조조(P치분별위0.0078화0.0082)。문권조사현시:80%이상적학생인위이안례위주선적교학능구제고학습흥취、자주학습능력、분석화해결문제능력이급지식응용등능력。결론이안례위주선적교학대제고학생적학습성적급종합능력우우전통교학。
Objective To examine the teaching effects of case-based learning in the class of functional experiment. Methods Students (n=139) of five-year clinical medicine specialty were ran-domly divided into control group (n=70) and case group (n=69). The students of control group were taught with traditional teaching method and the case-based learning was adapted in the case group. Namely the clinical cases were led into teaching and the teaching process was completed through case import, problem sets, and the literature review and discussion. The teaching effects were evaluated through questionnaire survey (Analysis by the χ2-test, the test level is 0.05) and the analysis of test scores (Analysis by the t-test, the test level is 0.05). Results The score of the case group was better than the control group in the operation test (P=0.042 0). The total evaluating score and test score were also better in the case group in comparing to the control group (P=0.007 8 or P=0.008 2). As indicated by the questionnaire survey, more than 80%students thought the case teaching method could improve their learning interests and the independent learning abilities. Moreover, the skills of problem analysis and knowledge application were increased through case teaching. Conclusion The teaching effects of case-based learning were superior to the traditional teaching.