中华医学教育探索杂志
中華醫學教育探索雜誌
중화의학교육탐색잡지
Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research
2015年
2期
190-194
,共5页
管欣%梁析%王峰%梁翔%巫金龙%祝巧良
管訢%樑析%王峰%樑翔%巫金龍%祝巧良
관흔%량석%왕봉%량상%무금룡%축교량
以问题为基础的学习%传统教学%长期记忆力
以問題為基礎的學習%傳統教學%長期記憶力
이문제위기출적학습%전통교학%장기기억력
Problem-based learning%Traditional learning%Long-term memory
目的:探讨以问题为基础的学习(problem-based learning, PBL)与传统教学(tradi-tional learning, TL)对学生长期记忆效果及临床实习能力的影响。方法选择上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院临床医学院2006、2007、2008级五年制本科学生共79人为研究对象。将其随机分为两组进行胸外科疾病食管癌教学改革,PBL组38人,TL组41人。通过两次考试评价,以及带教教师对学生的主观评价来评估教学效果。采用SPSS 17.0进行统计分析,考试成绩以x±s表示,组间比较行t检验;学生临床实习的主观印象评价结果采取等级秩和检验,检验水准α=0.05。结果6个月后进行的第二次考试中,PBL组学生平均成绩为(76.66±5.94)分,TL组平均成绩为(73.59±5.74)分,两组学生成绩比较差异无统计学意义(t=1.85,P=0.068)。而在临床实习阶段教师对学生各种能力的主观评价上,PBL组要稍好于TL组,其中获得优、良的两组学生人次和比例比较差异无统计学意义,P值分别为0.065、0.277。结论 PBL教学的优势是培养学生解决问题的能力,但是对学生的知识长期记忆效果影响有限。
目的:探討以問題為基礎的學習(problem-based learning, PBL)與傳統教學(tradi-tional learning, TL)對學生長期記憶效果及臨床實習能力的影響。方法選擇上海交通大學醫學院附屬第九人民醫院臨床醫學院2006、2007、2008級五年製本科學生共79人為研究對象。將其隨機分為兩組進行胸外科疾病食管癌教學改革,PBL組38人,TL組41人。通過兩次攷試評價,以及帶教教師對學生的主觀評價來評估教學效果。採用SPSS 17.0進行統計分析,攷試成績以x±s錶示,組間比較行t檢驗;學生臨床實習的主觀印象評價結果採取等級秩和檢驗,檢驗水準α=0.05。結果6箇月後進行的第二次攷試中,PBL組學生平均成績為(76.66±5.94)分,TL組平均成績為(73.59±5.74)分,兩組學生成績比較差異無統計學意義(t=1.85,P=0.068)。而在臨床實習階段教師對學生各種能力的主觀評價上,PBL組要稍好于TL組,其中穫得優、良的兩組學生人次和比例比較差異無統計學意義,P值分彆為0.065、0.277。結論 PBL教學的優勢是培養學生解決問題的能力,但是對學生的知識長期記憶效果影響有限。
목적:탐토이문제위기출적학습(problem-based learning, PBL)여전통교학(tradi-tional learning, TL)대학생장기기억효과급림상실습능력적영향。방법선택상해교통대학의학원부속제구인민의원림상의학원2006、2007、2008급오년제본과학생공79인위연구대상。장기수궤분위량조진행흉외과질병식관암교학개혁,PBL조38인,TL조41인。통과량차고시평개,이급대교교사대학생적주관평개래평고교학효과。채용SPSS 17.0진행통계분석,고시성적이x±s표시,조간비교행t검험;학생림상실습적주관인상평개결과채취등급질화검험,검험수준α=0.05。결과6개월후진행적제이차고시중,PBL조학생평균성적위(76.66±5.94)분,TL조평균성적위(73.59±5.74)분,량조학생성적비교차이무통계학의의(t=1.85,P=0.068)。이재림상실습계단교사대학생각충능력적주관평개상,PBL조요초호우TL조,기중획득우、량적량조학생인차화비례비교차이무통계학의의,P치분별위0.065、0.277。결론 PBL교학적우세시배양학생해결문제적능력,단시대학생적지식장기기억효과영향유한。
Objective To investigate effects of problem-based learning (PBL) and traditional learning (TL) on students' long-term memory and clinical practice ability. Methods Totally 79 5-year-program undergraduates of 2006, 2007, 2008 grade in school of clinical medicine of our hospital were randomly divided into PBL group (n=38) and TL group (n=41). The teaching effects were evaluated by two exams as well as teachers' subjective impression. SPSS 17.0 statistical analysis software was used;exam results were expressed as x±s; t test and rank sum test were used to analyze the exam results and subjective impression. α=0.05 was set as inspection level. Results In the second exam after 6 months, the mean exam scores were (76.66 ±5.94) and (73.59 ±5.74) in PBL group and TL group, without significant differences between the two groups (t=1.85, P=0.068). However, at clinical intern-ship stage, PBL group outperformed TL group based on the subjective evaluation (P=0.065, 0.277). Conclusion PBL can culture students' ability of problem-solving, but it is limited in culturing long-term memory.