中国医药指南
中國醫藥指南
중국의약지남
CHINA MEDICINE GUIDE
2015年
10期
15-16,17
,共3页
李伟%方黎%孙颖川%赵宏亮
李偉%方黎%孫穎川%趙宏亮
리위%방려%손영천%조굉량
体腔循环灌注热化疗%恶性腹腔积液%腹腔闭式引流术
體腔循環灌註熱化療%噁性腹腔積液%腹腔閉式引流術
체강순배관주열화료%악성복강적액%복강폐식인류술
Thermochemotherapy in systemic circulation%Malignant seroperitoneum%Peritoneal closed drainage
目的:观察体腔循环灌注热化疗治疗晚期肿瘤合并腹腔积液的疗效和安全性。方法随机抽样选取122例经组织病理学或细胞学检查确诊晚期肿瘤伴恶性腹腔积液患者作为研究对象,分别接受体腔循环灌注热化疗及腹腔灌注化疗。观察两组患者的疗效、不良反应及生存时间。结果体腔循环灌注热化疗组与腹腔灌注化疗组的腹腔积液有效率分别为81.1%、55.6%,疾病控制率分别为94.9%、77.8%。两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者中位PFS分别为6.6、5.4个月,有统计学意义(P<0.001),中位OS分别为15、13个月,无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组不良反应对照无差异(P>0.05)。结论体腔循环灌注热化疗能明显提高晚期肿瘤恶性腹腔积液的近期控制率,疗效显著,不良反应轻。
目的:觀察體腔循環灌註熱化療治療晚期腫瘤閤併腹腔積液的療效和安全性。方法隨機抽樣選取122例經組織病理學或細胞學檢查確診晚期腫瘤伴噁性腹腔積液患者作為研究對象,分彆接受體腔循環灌註熱化療及腹腔灌註化療。觀察兩組患者的療效、不良反應及生存時間。結果體腔循環灌註熱化療組與腹腔灌註化療組的腹腔積液有效率分彆為81.1%、55.6%,疾病控製率分彆為94.9%、77.8%。兩組差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。兩組患者中位PFS分彆為6.6、5.4箇月,有統計學意義(P<0.001),中位OS分彆為15、13箇月,無統計學意義(P>0.05);兩組不良反應對照無差異(P>0.05)。結論體腔循環灌註熱化療能明顯提高晚期腫瘤噁性腹腔積液的近期控製率,療效顯著,不良反應輕。
목적:관찰체강순배관주열화료치료만기종류합병복강적액적료효화안전성。방법수궤추양선취122례경조직병이학혹세포학검사학진만기종류반악성복강적액환자작위연구대상,분별접수체강순배관주열화료급복강관주화료。관찰량조환자적료효、불량반응급생존시간。결과체강순배관주열화료조여복강관주화료조적복강적액유효솔분별위81.1%、55.6%,질병공제솔분별위94.9%、77.8%。량조차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。량조환자중위PFS분별위6.6、5.4개월,유통계학의의(P<0.001),중위OS분별위15、13개월,무통계학의의(P>0.05);량조불량반응대조무차이(P>0.05)。결론체강순배관주열화료능명현제고만기종류악성복강적액적근기공제솔,료효현저,불량반응경。
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect and safety of body cavity perfusion hyperthermic chemotherapy in the treatment of malignant seroperitoneum. Methods 122 randomly selected patients of malignant seroperitoneum, which were diagnosed by histopathology or cytology, were treated by body cavity perfusion hyperthermic chemotherapy and abdominal perfusion chemotherapy. The efifcacy, adverse reactions and survival time after both treatments were analyzed.Results Body cavity perfusion thermo-chemotherapy group and intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal effusion efifciency of 81.1% and 55.6%, disease control rate was 94.9% and 77.8%. The difference was statistically signiifcant(P<0.05). Two groups of patients median PFS was 6.6 months and 5.4 months, statistically significant(P<0.001), median OS was 15 months and 13 months, no significant difference(P>0.05); Two adverse reactions in control no difference(P>0.05).Conclusion Thermochemotherapy in systemic circulation showed higher short-term efficiency and better safety than abdominal perfusion chemotherapy in the treatment of malignant seroperitoneum.