福建医科大学学报
福建醫科大學學報
복건의과대학학보
JOURNAL OF FUJIAN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY
2015年
1期
24-28
,共5页
黄志华%陈晓%黄建钗%王碧瑛
黃誌華%陳曉%黃建釵%王碧瑛
황지화%진효%황건차%왕벽영
多道睡眠描记术%睡眠呼吸暂停,阻塞性%睡眠呼吸暂停综合征%血氧测定法%氧
多道睡眠描記術%睡眠呼吸暫停,阻塞性%睡眠呼吸暫停綜閤徵%血氧測定法%氧
다도수면묘기술%수면호흡잠정,조새성%수면호흡잠정종합정%혈양측정법%양
polysomnography%sleep apnea,obstructive%sleep apnea syndromes%oximetry%oxygen
目的:探讨氧减指数(ODI)联合Epworth嗜睡量表(ESS)评分对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征(OSAHS)患者的临床诊断价值。方法纳入鼾症患者469例,根据呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI)分为单纯鼾症组及轻度、中度、重度 OSA HS 组,比较各组间 ESS 评分及多导睡眠图结果。做出 ODI、ESS 的受试者工作特效(ROC)曲线。采用Logistic回归和ROC曲线对ODI联合ESS评分做ROC曲线分析。结果(1)各组之间ESS评分、ODI、T s90%、LSaO2、M SaO2差别均有统计学意义( P均=0.000)。(2)所有患者的 ESS评分、ODI、T s90%、LSaO2、MSaO2均与AHI显著相关(P均=0.000),以ODI与AHI的相关性最好(r=0.917)。(3)分别以ODI≥5,10,15,20次/h为诊断OSA HS的标准,随ODI升高,敏感度下降,特异度上升,阳性预测值升高,阴性预测值下降。以ODI≥5次/h来诊断OSA HS的敏感度为92.8%,特异度为82%,阳性预测值为97.7%,阴性预测值为57.7%。(4)以ODI≥5次/h结合ESS 评分≥9分来诊断 OSAHS的敏感度为92.6%,特异度为86.0%,阳性预测值为98.2%,阴性预测值为61.4%。结论 ODI≥5次/h结合ESS评分≥9分对OSAHS的诊断有较大的价值,可作为OSA HS的初筛诊断标准。
目的:探討氧減指數(ODI)聯閤Epworth嗜睡量錶(ESS)評分對阻塞性睡眠呼吸暫停低通氣綜閤徵(OSAHS)患者的臨床診斷價值。方法納入鼾癥患者469例,根據呼吸暫停低通氣指數(AHI)分為單純鼾癥組及輕度、中度、重度 OSA HS 組,比較各組間 ESS 評分及多導睡眠圖結果。做齣 ODI、ESS 的受試者工作特效(ROC)麯線。採用Logistic迴歸和ROC麯線對ODI聯閤ESS評分做ROC麯線分析。結果(1)各組之間ESS評分、ODI、T s90%、LSaO2、M SaO2差彆均有統計學意義( P均=0.000)。(2)所有患者的 ESS評分、ODI、T s90%、LSaO2、MSaO2均與AHI顯著相關(P均=0.000),以ODI與AHI的相關性最好(r=0.917)。(3)分彆以ODI≥5,10,15,20次/h為診斷OSA HS的標準,隨ODI升高,敏感度下降,特異度上升,暘性預測值升高,陰性預測值下降。以ODI≥5次/h來診斷OSA HS的敏感度為92.8%,特異度為82%,暘性預測值為97.7%,陰性預測值為57.7%。(4)以ODI≥5次/h結閤ESS 評分≥9分來診斷 OSAHS的敏感度為92.6%,特異度為86.0%,暘性預測值為98.2%,陰性預測值為61.4%。結論 ODI≥5次/h結閤ESS評分≥9分對OSAHS的診斷有較大的價值,可作為OSA HS的初篩診斷標準。
목적:탐토양감지수(ODI)연합Epworth기수량표(ESS)평분대조새성수면호흡잠정저통기종합정(OSAHS)환자적림상진단개치。방법납입한증환자469례,근거호흡잠정저통기지수(AHI)분위단순한증조급경도、중도、중도 OSA HS 조,비교각조간 ESS 평분급다도수면도결과。주출 ODI、ESS 적수시자공작특효(ROC)곡선。채용Logistic회귀화ROC곡선대ODI연합ESS평분주ROC곡선분석。결과(1)각조지간ESS평분、ODI、T s90%、LSaO2、M SaO2차별균유통계학의의( P균=0.000)。(2)소유환자적 ESS평분、ODI、T s90%、LSaO2、MSaO2균여AHI현저상관(P균=0.000),이ODI여AHI적상관성최호(r=0.917)。(3)분별이ODI≥5,10,15,20차/h위진단OSA HS적표준,수ODI승고,민감도하강,특이도상승,양성예측치승고,음성예측치하강。이ODI≥5차/h래진단OSA HS적민감도위92.8%,특이도위82%,양성예측치위97.7%,음성예측치위57.7%。(4)이ODI≥5차/h결합ESS 평분≥9분래진단 OSAHS적민감도위92.6%,특이도위86.0%,양성예측치위98.2%,음성예측치위61.4%。결론 ODI≥5차/h결합ESS평분≥9분대OSAHS적진단유교대적개치,가작위OSA HS적초사진단표준。
Objective To study the diagnosis value of the combination of oxygen desaturation in‐dex (ODI ) and epworth sleepiness scale (ESS ) score in obstructive sleep apnea‐hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) . Methods A total of 469 patients who complained snoring and visited our Sleep‐Disordered Breathing Clinic Center were enrolled and divided into simple snore ,slight OSAHS ,moderate OSAHS , and severe OSA HS group by apnea hypopnea index (A HI) . We analyzed the ESS and result of polyso‐mography among the four groups . We then created receiver operating characteristic (ROC ) curves for ODI and ESS . We also analyzed the ROC curves of ODI combined with ESS score using logistic regres‐sion and ROC curve . Results The ESS ,ODI ,Ts90% ,LSaO2 ,MSaO2 had statistically significant differ‐ence among four groups (all P=0 .000) . There were statistically significant correlation between ESS , ODI ,Ts90% ,LSaO2 ,MSaO2 and AHI (all P=0 .000) ,while the correlation between ODI and AHI was the strongest(r=0 .917) . When ODI values ≥5 ,10 ,15 ,20 times/h respectively were used as the crite‐ria for diagnosis of OSAHS ,with the increase of ODI ,sensitivity decreased ,specificity increased ,positive predictive value increased ,while the negative predictive value decreased . When ODI≥5 times/h was cho‐sen as OSA HS diagnostic cut off point ,the sensitivity ,specificity ,the positive predictive value and the negative predictive value reached 92 .8% ,82% ,97 .7% and 57 .7% respectively . When ODI≥5 times/h combined with ESS≥9 was chosen as the diagnostic standard ,the sensitivity ,specificity ,the positive pre‐dictive value and the negative predictive value reached 92 .6% ,86 .0% ,98 .2% and 61 .4% respectively . Conclusions ODI≥5 times/h combined with ESS≥9 had the value for the diagnosis of OSA HS ,therefore it could be used widely for OSAHS patients screening using family portable oximeter and ESS .