CAJ | 학술논문

目的：探讨不同临床标本微生物检验的阳性率。方法将2011年1月～2012年12月的83份标本作为A组，将2013年1月～2014年12月的82份标本作为B组，2组均选择全自动细菌鉴定药敏分析仪进行标本检验，并严格参照相关标准完成各项操作。结果 A组呼吸道标本、粪便标本、血液标本检验阳性率分别为40.54%、5.00%、7.69%， B组则分别为27.03%、5.26%、16.00%，2组呼吸道标本、血液标本检验阳性率，P＜0.05，差异有统计学意义，粪便标本检验阳性率，P＞0.05，差异无统计学意义。结论呼吸道标本、血液标本在不同时间段检验的阳性率也有所不同，对此可作为临床诊断的重要依据，促进临床诊断水平的提高。
목적：탐토불동림상표본미생물검험적양성솔。방법장2011년1월～2012년12월적83빈표본작위A조，장2013년1월～2014년12월적82빈표본작위B조，2조균선택전자동세균감정약민분석의진행표본검험，병엄격삼조상관표준완성각항조작。결과 A조호흡도표본、분편표본、혈액표본검험양성솔분별위40.54%、5.00%、7.69%， B조칙분별위27.03%、5.26%、16.00%，2조호흡도표본、혈액표본검험양성솔，P＜0.05，차이유통계학의의，분편표본검험양성솔，P＞0.05，차이무통계학의의。결론호흡도표본、혈액표본재불동시간단검험적양성솔야유소불동，대차가작위림상진단적중요의거，촉진림상진단수평적제고。
Objective To investigate the positive rate of different microbiological testing of clinical specimens.Methods January 2011 to December 2012 selected 83 specimens Group A, the January 2013 to 2014 December selected 82 specimens as group B, two groups were identified bacterial susceptibility to select automatic analyzer specimens were tested, and strict reference to the relevant standard to complete the operation.ResultsA group of respiratory specimens, stool samples, blood samples test positive rate was respectively 40.54%, 5.00%, 7.69%, group B respectively 27.03%, 5.26%, 16.00%, two groups of respiratory specimens, blood samples tested positive rate the difference was statistically signiifcant (P<0.05), stool specimens testing positive rate was no signiifcant difference (P>0.05).Conclusion The respiratory specimens, blood samples at different time periods tested positive rate is also different, which can be used as an important basis for clinical diagnosis, promote the improvement of the level of clinical diagnosis.