安徽警官职业学院学报
安徽警官職業學院學報
안휘경관직업학원학보
JOURNAL OF ANHUI VOCATIONAL COLLEGE OF POLICE OFFICERS
2015年
2期
19-22
,共4页
敲诈勒索罪%抢劫罪%两个当场%罚当其罪%存疑有利被告
敲詐勒索罪%搶劫罪%兩箇噹場%罰噹其罪%存疑有利被告
고사륵색죄%창겁죄%량개당장%벌당기죄%존의유리피고
extortion%robbery%the two “on the spot”of the crime%principle of suiting punishment of crime%the thought of the Accused Innocent until Proven Guilty
敲诈勒索罪与抢劫罪之间的区分向来为司法实践中的疑难问题之一，特别是行为人当场实施暴力、当场取得财物的情况下，如何对行为进行准确定性，直接关系到刑法适用的准确性。“两个当场”原则并非区分敲诈勒索罪与抢劫罪的决定因素，应综合考虑行为人犯罪时实施暴力的程度、对象、时间及行为人当场取得财物的原因等具体情形，切实贯彻罪责刑相适应的刑法原则，做到罚当其罪。当无法确定当场暴力程度能否达到使他人不能反抗的程度时，应根据“存疑有利被告”的原则，认定为敲诈勒索罪。
敲詐勒索罪與搶劫罪之間的區分嚮來為司法實踐中的疑難問題之一，特彆是行為人噹場實施暴力、噹場取得財物的情況下，如何對行為進行準確定性，直接關繫到刑法適用的準確性。“兩箇噹場”原則併非區分敲詐勒索罪與搶劫罪的決定因素，應綜閤攷慮行為人犯罪時實施暴力的程度、對象、時間及行為人噹場取得財物的原因等具體情形，切實貫徹罪責刑相適應的刑法原則，做到罰噹其罪。噹無法確定噹場暴力程度能否達到使他人不能反抗的程度時，應根據“存疑有利被告”的原則，認定為敲詐勒索罪。
고사륵색죄여창겁죄지간적구분향래위사법실천중적의난문제지일，특별시행위인당장실시폭력、당장취득재물적정황하，여하대행위진행준학정성，직접관계도형법괄용적준학성。“량개당장”원칙병비구분고사륵색죄여창겁죄적결정인소，응종합고필행위인범죄시실시폭력적정도、대상、시간급행위인당장취득재물적원인등구체정형，절실관철죄책형상괄응적형법원칙，주도벌당기죄。당무법학정당장폭력정도능부체도사타인불능반항적정도시，응근거“존의유리피고”적원칙，인정위고사륵색죄。
In judicial practice, it is difficult to distinguish the crime of extortion from the crime of robbery, especially in the situation that the actor turned violent on the spot and obtained property on the spot, which directly influences the application of the criminal law. The principle of the two “on the spot” is not the determinant, and the actor’s violent degree, objective, time and the property should all be taken into accounts. We should implement the responsibility going with penalty principle, and adhere to the thought of the Accused Innocent until Proven Guilty. When it is unable to determine the level of violence on the spot whether it can reach the level of which others cannot be resistance, we should be based on the principle of "doubtful" favorable defendants, and determine it the crime of extortion.
