中国生化药物杂志
中國生化藥物雜誌
중국생화약물잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF BIOCHEMICAL PHARMACEUTICS
2015年
4期
141-143
,共3页
胡海强%於华敏%孙金栋%袁红
鬍海彊%於華敏%孫金棟%袁紅
호해강%어화민%손금동%원홍
厄贝沙坦%氨氯地平%高血压%糖尿病肾病
阨貝沙坦%氨氯地平%高血壓%糖尿病腎病
액패사탄%안록지평%고혈압%당뇨병신병
Irbesartan%Amlodipine%Hypertension%Diabetic nephropathy
目的:探讨厄贝沙坦联合氨氯地平治疗高血压合并糖尿病肾病的治疗效果。方法对2011年3月~2014年3月于余杭区第一人民医院院收治的糖尿病肾病合并高血压的患者120例,随机分为3组,每组40例,根据其给药情况分别为厄贝沙坦组、氨氯地平组、厄贝沙坦联合氨氯地平组。治疗10周后对3组患者的血压、24h尿白蛋白、24h尿蛋白定量和尿β2-微球蛋白等指标进行观察和比较。结果治疗后,A、B两组组总有效率无统计学差异。 C组总有效率(92.5%)显著高于A组(χ2=6.65,P<0.05),C组总有效率显著高于B组(χ2=7.81,P<0.05)。治疗后,3组患者的血压均下降至正常水平,但是联用组的血压显著低于厄贝沙坦组和氨氯地平组,差异具有统计学意义( P<0.05);治疗后3组患者的尿液检查相关指标亦显著降低,但是联用组的24 h尿白蛋白、24 h尿蛋白定量和尿β2-微球蛋白等均显著低于厄贝沙坦组和氨氯地平组,差异具有统计学意义( P<0.05)。3组均无明显不良反应。结论厄贝沙坦联合氨氯地平治疗高血压合并糖尿病肾病相比较单独用药疗效显著。
目的:探討阨貝沙坦聯閤氨氯地平治療高血壓閤併糖尿病腎病的治療效果。方法對2011年3月~2014年3月于餘杭區第一人民醫院院收治的糖尿病腎病閤併高血壓的患者120例,隨機分為3組,每組40例,根據其給藥情況分彆為阨貝沙坦組、氨氯地平組、阨貝沙坦聯閤氨氯地平組。治療10週後對3組患者的血壓、24h尿白蛋白、24h尿蛋白定量和尿β2-微毬蛋白等指標進行觀察和比較。結果治療後,A、B兩組組總有效率無統計學差異。 C組總有效率(92.5%)顯著高于A組(χ2=6.65,P<0.05),C組總有效率顯著高于B組(χ2=7.81,P<0.05)。治療後,3組患者的血壓均下降至正常水平,但是聯用組的血壓顯著低于阨貝沙坦組和氨氯地平組,差異具有統計學意義( P<0.05);治療後3組患者的尿液檢查相關指標亦顯著降低,但是聯用組的24 h尿白蛋白、24 h尿蛋白定量和尿β2-微毬蛋白等均顯著低于阨貝沙坦組和氨氯地平組,差異具有統計學意義( P<0.05)。3組均無明顯不良反應。結論阨貝沙坦聯閤氨氯地平治療高血壓閤併糖尿病腎病相比較單獨用藥療效顯著。
목적:탐토액패사탄연합안록지평치료고혈압합병당뇨병신병적치료효과。방법대2011년3월~2014년3월우여항구제일인민의원원수치적당뇨병신병합병고혈압적환자120례,수궤분위3조,매조40례,근거기급약정황분별위액패사탄조、안록지평조、액패사탄연합안록지평조。치료10주후대3조환자적혈압、24h뇨백단백、24h뇨단백정량화뇨β2-미구단백등지표진행관찰화비교。결과치료후,A、B량조조총유효솔무통계학차이。 C조총유효솔(92.5%)현저고우A조(χ2=6.65,P<0.05),C조총유효솔현저고우B조(χ2=7.81,P<0.05)。치료후,3조환자적혈압균하강지정상수평,단시련용조적혈압현저저우액패사탄조화안록지평조,차이구유통계학의의( P<0.05);치료후3조환자적뇨액검사상관지표역현저강저,단시련용조적24 h뇨백단백、24 h뇨단백정량화뇨β2-미구단백등균현저저우액패사탄조화안록지평조,차이구유통계학의의( P<0.05)。3조균무명현불량반응。결론액패사탄연합안록지평치료고혈압합병당뇨병신병상비교단독용약료효현저。
Objective To explore the therapeutic efficacy of irbesartan combined amlodipine for the treatment of hypertension and diabetic nephropathy.Methods 120 patients with diabetic nephropathy and hypertension received from March 2011 to March 2014 were randomly divided into three groups according to its administration circumstances ( irbesartan group and amlodipine group, irbesartan and amlodipine groups) , with 40 patients in each group.Blood pressure, 24h urine albumin, 24h urinary protein excretion and urine β2-microglobulin and other indicators of the three groups of patients were observed and compared after 10 weeks of treatment.Results After treatment, the total efficiency of A, B two groups was no significant difference.The total effective rate of group C (92.5%) was significantly higher than that in A group (χ2 =6.65, P<0.05), the total effective rate of group C was significantly higher than that of group B (χ2 =7.81, P<0.05).The blood pressure in patients of three groups were all dropped to normal after treatment, but the one in combination group was significantly lower than the irbesartan group and amlodipine group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).The urine tests related indicators of patients in the three groups were also significantly reduced after treatment , but 24 h urine albumin, 24 h urinary protein excretion and urine β2-microglobulin in combination group were significantly lower than the irbesartan group and amlodipine group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).Three groups were no obvious adverse reactions. Conclusion Irbesartan combined amlodipine for the treatment of hypertension and diabetic nephropathy has significant efficacy compared to single drug.