中国神经精神疾病杂志
中國神經精神疾病雜誌
중국신경정신질병잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASES
2015年
4期
203-207
,共5页
李铿%何健%蒋霞%赵文莉%潘卫民%王为民%王天成
李鏗%何健%蔣霞%趙文莉%潘衛民%王為民%王天成
리갱%하건%장하%조문리%반위민%왕위민%왕천성
癫痫生活质量%影响因素%农村地区
癲癇生活質量%影響因素%農村地區
전간생활질량%영향인소%농촌지구
Epilepsy%Quality of life%Influencing factors%Rural areas
目的:研究甘肃农村地区成年癫痫患者的生活质量及其影响因素。方法采用癫痫患者生活质量量表-31(quality of life in epilepsy inventory,QOLIE-31)对甘肃省农村地区154例癫痫患者及149名正常对照进行生活质量评估,分析社会人口学因素(性别、年龄、婚姻状况、职业、教育程度等)和临床因素(癫痫起病年龄、病程、发作类型、发作频率、服用药物种数等)对患者生活质量的影响。结果患者生活质量得分低于对照组[(47.63±7.74) vs.(52.28±5.75)],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。不同性别、婚姻状况、职业、受教育程度、发作类型的患者生活质量得分无统计学差异(P>0.05),不同人均年收入、服用药物种数的患者生活质量得分有统计学差异(P<0.05)。经多因素线性回归分析,患者家庭人均年收入(β=3.115,P=0.002)、服用药物种数(β=3.261,P=0.027)是影响其生活质量的因素。结论成年癫痫患者生活质量较低,家庭经济状况、服用药物种类对患者生活质量影响较显著,合理选择药物是控制癫痫发作、减轻家庭经济负担、提高癫痫患者生活质量的有效措施。
目的:研究甘肅農村地區成年癲癇患者的生活質量及其影響因素。方法採用癲癇患者生活質量量錶-31(quality of life in epilepsy inventory,QOLIE-31)對甘肅省農村地區154例癲癇患者及149名正常對照進行生活質量評估,分析社會人口學因素(性彆、年齡、婚姻狀況、職業、教育程度等)和臨床因素(癲癇起病年齡、病程、髮作類型、髮作頻率、服用藥物種數等)對患者生活質量的影響。結果患者生活質量得分低于對照組[(47.63±7.74) vs.(52.28±5.75)],差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。不同性彆、婚姻狀況、職業、受教育程度、髮作類型的患者生活質量得分無統計學差異(P>0.05),不同人均年收入、服用藥物種數的患者生活質量得分有統計學差異(P<0.05)。經多因素線性迴歸分析,患者傢庭人均年收入(β=3.115,P=0.002)、服用藥物種數(β=3.261,P=0.027)是影響其生活質量的因素。結論成年癲癇患者生活質量較低,傢庭經濟狀況、服用藥物種類對患者生活質量影響較顯著,閤理選擇藥物是控製癲癇髮作、減輕傢庭經濟負擔、提高癲癇患者生活質量的有效措施。
목적:연구감숙농촌지구성년전간환자적생활질량급기영향인소。방법채용전간환자생활질량량표-31(quality of life in epilepsy inventory,QOLIE-31)대감숙성농촌지구154례전간환자급149명정상대조진행생활질량평고,분석사회인구학인소(성별、년령、혼인상황、직업、교육정도등)화림상인소(전간기병년령、병정、발작류형、발작빈솔、복용약물충수등)대환자생활질량적영향。결과환자생활질량득분저우대조조[(47.63±7.74) vs.(52.28±5.75)],차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。불동성별、혼인상황、직업、수교육정도、발작류형적환자생활질량득분무통계학차이(P>0.05),불동인균년수입、복용약물충수적환자생활질량득분유통계학차이(P<0.05)。경다인소선성회귀분석,환자가정인균년수입(β=3.115,P=0.002)、복용약물충수(β=3.261,P=0.027)시영향기생활질량적인소。결론성년전간환자생활질량교저,가정경제상황、복용약물충류대환자생활질량영향교현저,합리선택약물시공제전간발작、감경가정경제부담、제고전간환자생활질량적유효조시。
Objective To explore the quality of life and the related factors in adult epilepsy patients in rural areas of Gansu province. Methods The Quality of Life in the Epilepsy-31 Inventory Chinese version (QOLIE-31) were used to evaluate the quality of life in 154 epilepsy patients and 149 healthy controls. The relationship of demographic variables (gender, age, marital status, profession and education, etc.) and clinical variables (age of onset, duration, type of seizures, seizure frequency and medication, etc.) with the quality of life were analyzed in patients. Results Compared with the con?trol group, the QOLIE-31 score was significantly lower in epileptic group [(47.63±7.74) vs. (52.28±5.75), P<0.05]. There was no significant difference in the patients' QOLIE-31 score between difference ages, genders, marital status, occupa?tions, and educations (P>0.05). The differences of patients' QOLIE-31 score were significantly different between differ?ent incomes, medication types of epilepsy (P<0.05). The patient's family income (β=3.115, P=0.002) and the type of medi?cation (β=3.261, P=0.027) were factors affecting their quality of life. Conclusion The quality of life in adult patients with epilepsy is lower. Economic status of family and the number of drug type significantly affects the quality of life in patients. Reasonable drug choice to treat seizure and reduce the economic burden of the family are effective measures to improve the quality of life of patients with epilepsy.