当代护士(下旬刊)
噹代護士(下旬刊)
당대호사(하순간)
Today Nurse
2015年
5期
3-4,5
,共3页
改良吸痰法%重型颅脑损伤%气管切开术%肺部感染
改良吸痰法%重型顱腦損傷%氣管切開術%肺部感染
개량흡담법%중형로뇌손상%기관절개술%폐부감염
The Modified Suction Method%Severe Craniocerebral Injury%Tracheotomy%Pulmonary Infection
目的:探讨合理简化吸痰操作流程,实施改良吸痰法,对重症颅脑损伤气管切开术后肺部感染的预防效果。方法将60例重症颅脑损伤气管切开术后患者,按随机法分为改良方法组和传统方法组,每组均为30例。改良组吸痰前不试吸,发现患者有痰液堵塞,立即吸痰,保持呼吸道通畅,吸痰后用消毒液冲洗管道,暂停吸痰时吸引器接头浸泡于悬挂床头的消毒液瓶中。传统方法组用常规吸痰方法,吸痰前生理盐水试吸,吸痰后去除吸痰管,按常规在已经试吸过的生理盐水内冲洗管道。两组均应用两步吸痰法,即先用负压将气管导管内痰液吸净,然后按常规吸痰法吸气管深部的痰液。结果改良吸痰法与传统的吸痰法相比较,在两组吸痰指征相同的情况下,传统组吸痰所需时间为(121.67±0.70)s,改良组为(91.67±0.10)s,改良组吸痰所需时间低于传统组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),可节省时间约30 s;在患者指脉氧低于正常值且需要吸痰时,传统组吸痰后患者恢复 SpO2正常时间为(69.44±6.08) s,改良组为(42.78±0.49)s,改良组吸痰 SpO2恢复所需时间低于传统组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);但患者指脉氧为正常值且需要吸痰时,两组指脉氧恢复到吸痰前水平所需时间无明显差异性(P>0.05)。住院7 d 内,传统组感染率为53.3%,改良组为23.3%,改良组肺部感染率较传统组低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);气道损伤、出血发生率,两组无明显差异性。结论改良吸痰法能赢得危重患者抢救时间,降低脑缺氧的发生,有效预防肺部感染,减少院内感染,节约资源和护理劳动力,改良吸痰法值得在临床推广。
目的:探討閤理簡化吸痰操作流程,實施改良吸痰法,對重癥顱腦損傷氣管切開術後肺部感染的預防效果。方法將60例重癥顱腦損傷氣管切開術後患者,按隨機法分為改良方法組和傳統方法組,每組均為30例。改良組吸痰前不試吸,髮現患者有痰液堵塞,立即吸痰,保持呼吸道通暢,吸痰後用消毒液遲洗管道,暫停吸痰時吸引器接頭浸泡于懸掛床頭的消毒液瓶中。傳統方法組用常規吸痰方法,吸痰前生理鹽水試吸,吸痰後去除吸痰管,按常規在已經試吸過的生理鹽水內遲洗管道。兩組均應用兩步吸痰法,即先用負壓將氣管導管內痰液吸淨,然後按常規吸痰法吸氣管深部的痰液。結果改良吸痰法與傳統的吸痰法相比較,在兩組吸痰指徵相同的情況下,傳統組吸痰所需時間為(121.67±0.70)s,改良組為(91.67±0.10)s,改良組吸痰所需時間低于傳統組,差異有統計學意義(P<0.01),可節省時間約30 s;在患者指脈氧低于正常值且需要吸痰時,傳統組吸痰後患者恢複 SpO2正常時間為(69.44±6.08) s,改良組為(42.78±0.49)s,改良組吸痰 SpO2恢複所需時間低于傳統組,差異有統計學意義(P<0.01);但患者指脈氧為正常值且需要吸痰時,兩組指脈氧恢複到吸痰前水平所需時間無明顯差異性(P>0.05)。住院7 d 內,傳統組感染率為53.3%,改良組為23.3%,改良組肺部感染率較傳統組低,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);氣道損傷、齣血髮生率,兩組無明顯差異性。結論改良吸痰法能贏得危重患者搶救時間,降低腦缺氧的髮生,有效預防肺部感染,減少院內感染,節約資源和護理勞動力,改良吸痰法值得在臨床推廣。
목적:탐토합리간화흡담조작류정,실시개량흡담법,대중증로뇌손상기관절개술후폐부감염적예방효과。방법장60례중증로뇌손상기관절개술후환자,안수궤법분위개량방법조화전통방법조,매조균위30례。개량조흡담전불시흡,발현환자유담액도새,립즉흡담,보지호흡도통창,흡담후용소독액충세관도,잠정흡담시흡인기접두침포우현괘상두적소독액병중。전통방법조용상규흡담방법,흡담전생리염수시흡,흡담후거제흡담관,안상규재이경시흡과적생리염수내충세관도。량조균응용량보흡담법,즉선용부압장기관도관내담액흡정,연후안상규흡담법흡기관심부적담액。결과개량흡담법여전통적흡담법상비교,재량조흡담지정상동적정황하,전통조흡담소수시간위(121.67±0.70)s,개량조위(91.67±0.10)s,개량조흡담소수시간저우전통조,차이유통계학의의(P<0.01),가절성시간약30 s;재환자지맥양저우정상치차수요흡담시,전통조흡담후환자회복 SpO2정상시간위(69.44±6.08) s,개량조위(42.78±0.49)s,개량조흡담 SpO2회복소수시간저우전통조,차이유통계학의의(P<0.01);단환자지맥양위정상치차수요흡담시,량조지맥양회복도흡담전수평소수시간무명현차이성(P>0.05)。주원7 d 내,전통조감염솔위53.3%,개량조위23.3%,개량조폐부감염솔교전통조저,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05);기도손상、출혈발생솔,량조무명현차이성。결론개량흡담법능영득위중환자창구시간,강저뇌결양적발생,유효예방폐부감염,감소원내감염,절약자원화호리노동력,개량흡담법치득재림상추엄。
Objective To evaluate the effect of the modified suction method for the prevention of patients who had picked up a pulmonary in-fection after tracheotomy resulting from severe craniocerebral injury.Methods 60 patients after tracheotomy with severe craniocerebral injury were randomly divided into two groups,modified group of 30 cases,and traditional group of 30 cases.Pre-suck was not carried out in the modi-fied group before aspiration of sputum.Once sputum blockage found in patients,the sputum was sucked immediately,and the airway kept unob-structed.After suction,the pipeline was flushed with disinfectant liquid,and the sputum aspirator was soaked in disinfectant liquid hanging be-side the bed.Routine application was used in the traditional group,in which saline was used for pre-sucking before sputum aspirating,and after sputum aspirating,the pipe was removed and flushed with disinfectant liquid.Both of the groups use the two-steps sputum suction method,at first sucking tracheal sputum completely with negative pressure,then sucking the deep tracheal sputum.Results Compared with the traditional group,the time of suction the traditional group need was(121.67±0.70)s,and the modified group was(91.67±0.10)s.The latter was less than the former(P<0.01).And the modified group can cut down on time for about 30S.As to the patients with finger pulse oxygen value below nor-mal and with indication of tracheal sputum sucking,the restored time of the finger pulse oxygen value of the traditional group was(69.44±6. 08)s,and the modified group was(42.78±0.49)s.The latter was less than the former(P<0.01).But as to the patients with normal finger pulse oxygen value who also need tracheal sputum sucking,the restored time of the finger pulse oxygen value made no significant difference between the two groups.The rate of pulmonary infection within 7 days of hospitalization of the modified group was lower than that of the traditional group (P<0.05),the former was 23.3%,and the latter was 53.3%;and there was no significant difference between the two groups in airway injury and hemorrhage.Conclusion The modified suction method can gain the time in rescuing of the critical patients,lower the rate of cerebral an-oxia,prevent pulmonary infection efficiently,reduce hospital infection,save resources and nursing labor,and the nurses are willing to use the method in clinical practice.