中外医疗
中外醫療
중외의료
CHINA FOREIGN MEDICAL TREATMENT
2015年
8期
1-2,5
,共3页
乳腺钼靶X线%摄影方法%摄影图像%质量%因素
乳腺鉬靶X線%攝影方法%攝影圖像%質量%因素
유선목파X선%섭영방법%섭영도상%질량%인소
X-ray mammography%Photographic method%Photographic image%Quality%Factors
目的:探讨乳腺钼靶X线的摄影方法及影响摄影图像质量的因素。方法随机选取该院2013年5月—2014年5月间收治的乳腺病患者80例,且均经过病理确诊,将其随机分为对照组和观察组,分别为40例,对照组采用超声诊断的方法,而观察组则采用乳腺钼靶X线摄影方法,对比两种诊断方式的结果,并探讨乳腺钼靶X线照片的质量及其影响摄影图像质量因素。结果超声诊断符合率达到57.5%(23/40),而乳腺钼靶X线符合率达到77.5%(31/40)两者相较而言,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);影响乳腺照片质量的因素有多种,其中包括体位不符合标准、显像层次不分明,以及划痕等。结论乳腺钼靶X线能够有效提高乳腺疾病的诊断率,优于超声诊断的方法。与此同时,确保乳腺钼靶规范化检查,能够有效提高乳腺钼靶X线的摄影质量,进一步提高诊断价值。
目的:探討乳腺鉬靶X線的攝影方法及影響攝影圖像質量的因素。方法隨機選取該院2013年5月—2014年5月間收治的乳腺病患者80例,且均經過病理確診,將其隨機分為對照組和觀察組,分彆為40例,對照組採用超聲診斷的方法,而觀察組則採用乳腺鉬靶X線攝影方法,對比兩種診斷方式的結果,併探討乳腺鉬靶X線照片的質量及其影響攝影圖像質量因素。結果超聲診斷符閤率達到57.5%(23/40),而乳腺鉬靶X線符閤率達到77.5%(31/40)兩者相較而言,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);影響乳腺照片質量的因素有多種,其中包括體位不符閤標準、顯像層次不分明,以及劃痕等。結論乳腺鉬靶X線能夠有效提高乳腺疾病的診斷率,優于超聲診斷的方法。與此同時,確保乳腺鉬靶規範化檢查,能夠有效提高乳腺鉬靶X線的攝影質量,進一步提高診斷價值。
목적:탐토유선목파X선적섭영방법급영향섭영도상질량적인소。방법수궤선취해원2013년5월—2014년5월간수치적유선병환자80례,차균경과병리학진,장기수궤분위대조조화관찰조,분별위40례,대조조채용초성진단적방법,이관찰조칙채용유선목파X선섭영방법,대비량충진단방식적결과,병탐토유선목파X선조편적질량급기영향섭영도상질량인소。결과초성진단부합솔체도57.5%(23/40),이유선목파X선부합솔체도77.5%(31/40)량자상교이언,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05);영향유선조편질량적인소유다충,기중포괄체위불부합표준、현상층차불분명,이급화흔등。결론유선목파X선능구유효제고유선질병적진단솔,우우초성진단적방법。여차동시,학보유선목파규범화검사,능구유효제고유선목파X선적섭영질량,진일보제고진단개치。
Objective To investigate the X-ray mammography photographic method and influencing factors of photographic image quality. Methods 80 patients with breast disease confirmed pathologically admitted in our hospital from May 2013 to May 2014 were selected and randomly divided into the control group and the observation group with 40 cases in each. The control group used the method of ultrasonic diagnosis, and the observation group adopted X-ray mammography. The results of the two diagnostic methods were compared. And the quality of X-ray mammography and influencing factors of photographic image were investigated. Results The diagnostic accordance rate of ultrasound reached 57.5%(23/40), while that of X-ray mammography reached 77.5%(31/40), the difference between the two groups was statistically significant(P<0.05). There are many factors influencing the quality of mammography, such as position does not meet the criteria, imaging level is not clear, and scratch and so forth. Conclusion X-ray mammography can effectively improve the diagnosis rate of breast disease, which is better than the ultrasonic diagnosis. And ensur-ing the standardized mammography examination, can effectively improve the X-ray mammography photographic quality and further enhance the diagnostic value.