中华传染病杂志
中華傳染病雜誌
중화전염병잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
2015年
3期
142-145
,共4页
赵清霞%孙燕%刘春礼%杨萱%陈媛媛%李超锋%邓昕
趙清霞%孫燕%劉春禮%楊萱%陳媛媛%李超鋒%鄧昕
조청하%손연%류춘례%양훤%진원원%리초봉%산흔
获得性免疫缺陷综合征%洛匹那韦%利托那韦%病毒抑制%免疫重建
穫得性免疫缺陷綜閤徵%洛匹那韋%利託那韋%病毒抑製%免疫重建
획득성면역결함종합정%락필나위%리탁나위%병독억제%면역중건
Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome%Lopinavir%Ritonavir%Viral inhibition%Immunological reconstruction
目的 评价含洛匹那韦/利托那韦(LPV/r)抗反转录病毒治疗(ART)方案作为二线方案的疗效及患者的耐受性.方法 收集2009年1月1日至2013年12月31日河南省免费抗病毒治疗数据库中一线ART方案治疗1年以上、更换含有LPV/r的二线ART方案治疗1年以上的艾滋病患者相关资料,根据更换方案时HIV抑制情况,分为一线治疗病毒学失败组、病毒抑制成功但免疫功能重建不良组,分析两组含LPV/r二线方案治疗后6、12、24个月CD4+T淋巴细胞计数变化趋势,6~12个月、12~24个月病毒学抑制率,以及不良事件发生情况.非正态分布的计量资料比较采用秩和检验,计数资料比较采用卡方检验.结果 共纳入研究4 113例,其中一线方案失败组3 802例,免疫重建不良组311例.一线方案失败组和免疫重建不良组患者更换为含有LPV/r的二线方案治疗6、12及24个月时CD4+T淋巴细胞计数均较基线逐步升高(均P<0.01).一线方案失败组更换二线方案治疗6~12月病毒抑制率为61.65%(1 408/2 284),12~24个月为68.91%(2 044/2 966).一线方案失败组不良反应发生率为21.88%(832/3 802),免疫重建不良组为22.19%(69/311),两组不良反应发生率的差异无统计学意义(x2 =0.015 P=0.901).结论 含有LPV/r ART方案对于初始治疗失败及免疫功能重建不良的艾滋病患者仍具有较好的病毒抑制效果及免疫重建效果.
目的 評價含洛匹那韋/利託那韋(LPV/r)抗反轉錄病毒治療(ART)方案作為二線方案的療效及患者的耐受性.方法 收集2009年1月1日至2013年12月31日河南省免費抗病毒治療數據庫中一線ART方案治療1年以上、更換含有LPV/r的二線ART方案治療1年以上的艾滋病患者相關資料,根據更換方案時HIV抑製情況,分為一線治療病毒學失敗組、病毒抑製成功但免疫功能重建不良組,分析兩組含LPV/r二線方案治療後6、12、24箇月CD4+T淋巴細胞計數變化趨勢,6~12箇月、12~24箇月病毒學抑製率,以及不良事件髮生情況.非正態分佈的計量資料比較採用秩和檢驗,計數資料比較採用卡方檢驗.結果 共納入研究4 113例,其中一線方案失敗組3 802例,免疫重建不良組311例.一線方案失敗組和免疫重建不良組患者更換為含有LPV/r的二線方案治療6、12及24箇月時CD4+T淋巴細胞計數均較基線逐步升高(均P<0.01).一線方案失敗組更換二線方案治療6~12月病毒抑製率為61.65%(1 408/2 284),12~24箇月為68.91%(2 044/2 966).一線方案失敗組不良反應髮生率為21.88%(832/3 802),免疫重建不良組為22.19%(69/311),兩組不良反應髮生率的差異無統計學意義(x2 =0.015 P=0.901).結論 含有LPV/r ART方案對于初始治療失敗及免疫功能重建不良的艾滋病患者仍具有較好的病毒抑製效果及免疫重建效果.
목적 평개함락필나위/리탁나위(LPV/r)항반전록병독치료(ART)방안작위이선방안적료효급환자적내수성.방법 수집2009년1월1일지2013년12월31일하남성면비항병독치료수거고중일선ART방안치료1년이상、경환함유LPV/r적이선ART방안치료1년이상적애자병환자상관자료,근거경환방안시HIV억제정황,분위일선치료병독학실패조、병독억제성공단면역공능중건불량조,분석량조함LPV/r이선방안치료후6、12、24개월CD4+T림파세포계수변화추세,6~12개월、12~24개월병독학억제솔,이급불량사건발생정황.비정태분포적계량자료비교채용질화검험,계수자료비교채용잡방검험.결과 공납입연구4 113례,기중일선방안실패조3 802례,면역중건불량조311례.일선방안실패조화면역중건불량조환자경환위함유LPV/r적이선방안치료6、12급24개월시CD4+T림파세포계수균교기선축보승고(균P<0.01).일선방안실패조경환이선방안치료6~12월병독억제솔위61.65%(1 408/2 284),12~24개월위68.91%(2 044/2 966).일선방안실패조불량반응발생솔위21.88%(832/3 802),면역중건불량조위22.19%(69/311),량조불량반응발생솔적차이무통계학의의(x2 =0.015 P=0.901).결론 함유LPV/r ART방안대우초시치료실패급면역공능중건불량적애자병환자잉구유교호적병독억제효과급면역중건효과.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of antiretroviral therapy (ART)regimen containing lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) as a second-line regimen.Methods Data of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) patients who have received the first-line therapy for over a year and changed to the second-line antiviral therapy regimen containing LPV/r for more than one year were collected retrospectively from the database of free antiviral therapy in Henan Province from January 1,2009 to December 31,2013.Based on the viral load inhibition status after the alteration of the regimen,the patients were assigned to virology failure with first-line therapy group,and successful viral inhibition but poor immunological reconstruction with first-line therapy group.The variation trend of CD4+ T lymphocyte counts of the two groups in 6,12,24 months after changed to the second-line regimen of LPV/r,the virology inhibition rates between 6 and 12 months,12 and 24 months,and occurrence of adverse events were analyzed.Quantitative data were analyzed by rank sum test,and qualitative data were analyzed by chi-square test.Results A total of 4 113 patients were divided into two groups,including the first-line therapy failure group (n=3 802) and poor immunological reconstruction group (n=311).At 6,12 and 24 months after the alteration of the regimen,the CD4+ T lymphocyte counts increased gradually (all P<0.01).Between 6 and 12 months after the first-line therapy failure group changed to the secondline regimen,viral inhibition rate was 61.65%(1 408/2 284),while that 12 and 24 months was 68.91%(2 044/2 966).The incidences of adverse reaction of the two groups were 21.88% (832/3 802) and 22.19%(69/311),respectively,which were not significantly different (x2 =0.015,P=0.901).Condusion The ART regimen containing LPV/r still has good viral inhibition effect and immunological reconstruction effect for AIDS patients who failed the initial therapy with poor immunological reconstruction.