中国民康医学
中國民康醫學
중국민강의학
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF CHINSEE PEOPLE HEALTH
2015年
8期
9-10,13
,共3页
氨磺必利%喹硫平%慢性精神分裂症
氨磺必利%喹硫平%慢性精神分裂癥
안광필리%규류평%만성정신분렬증
Amisulpride%Quetiapine%Chronic schizophrenia
目的::探讨氨磺必利治疗慢性精神分裂症患者的疗效与安全性。方法:将80例慢性精神分裂症患者随机分为氨磺必利组和喹硫平组,每组40例,分别给予患者氨磺必利和喹硫平治疗,疗程12周。于治疗前和治疗2、4、8、12周,采用阳性和阴性症状量表( PANSS)、临床疗效总评量表( CGI-SI)评定两组患者的临床疗效;不良反应量表( TESS)、锥体外系副反应量表( RSESE)评定两组患者的不良反应。结果:两组患者的显效率(P>0.05)和有效率(P>0.05)差异无统计学意义;治疗2周,氨磺必利组患者的阳性症状分、阴性症状分、PANSS总分及CGI-SI评分较治疗前显著降低(P<0.05或P<0.001);喹硫平组患者则于治疗4周,PANSS总分及各因子分、CGI-SI评分较治疗前显著降低(P<0.05或P<0.001);治疗4周(P<0.05)、8周(P<0.05)、12周(P<0.05),氨磺必利组患者的PANSS阴性症状分明显优于喹硫平组;两组患者的不良反应较少。结论:氨磺必利治疗慢性精神分裂症患者安全有效。
目的::探討氨磺必利治療慢性精神分裂癥患者的療效與安全性。方法:將80例慢性精神分裂癥患者隨機分為氨磺必利組和喹硫平組,每組40例,分彆給予患者氨磺必利和喹硫平治療,療程12週。于治療前和治療2、4、8、12週,採用暘性和陰性癥狀量錶( PANSS)、臨床療效總評量錶( CGI-SI)評定兩組患者的臨床療效;不良反應量錶( TESS)、錐體外繫副反應量錶( RSESE)評定兩組患者的不良反應。結果:兩組患者的顯效率(P>0.05)和有效率(P>0.05)差異無統計學意義;治療2週,氨磺必利組患者的暘性癥狀分、陰性癥狀分、PANSS總分及CGI-SI評分較治療前顯著降低(P<0.05或P<0.001);喹硫平組患者則于治療4週,PANSS總分及各因子分、CGI-SI評分較治療前顯著降低(P<0.05或P<0.001);治療4週(P<0.05)、8週(P<0.05)、12週(P<0.05),氨磺必利組患者的PANSS陰性癥狀分明顯優于喹硫平組;兩組患者的不良反應較少。結論:氨磺必利治療慢性精神分裂癥患者安全有效。
목적::탐토안광필리치료만성정신분렬증환자적료효여안전성。방법:장80례만성정신분렬증환자수궤분위안광필리조화규류평조,매조40례,분별급여환자안광필리화규류평치료,료정12주。우치료전화치료2、4、8、12주,채용양성화음성증상량표( PANSS)、림상료효총평량표( CGI-SI)평정량조환자적림상료효;불량반응량표( TESS)、추체외계부반응량표( RSESE)평정량조환자적불량반응。결과:량조환자적현효솔(P>0.05)화유효솔(P>0.05)차이무통계학의의;치료2주,안광필리조환자적양성증상분、음성증상분、PANSS총분급CGI-SI평분교치료전현저강저(P<0.05혹P<0.001);규류평조환자칙우치료4주,PANSS총분급각인자분、CGI-SI평분교치료전현저강저(P<0.05혹P<0.001);치료4주(P<0.05)、8주(P<0.05)、12주(P<0.05),안광필리조환자적PANSS음성증상분명현우우규류평조;량조환자적불량반응교소。결론:안광필리치료만성정신분렬증환자안전유효。
Objective:To explore efficacy and safety of Amisulpride in treatment of chronic schizophrenia. Methods:80 pa-tients with chronic schizophrenia were randomly assigned to Amisulpride group (n=40) and Quetiapine group (n=40) and treated for 12 weeks. Positive and negative symptom scale ( PANSS) , clinical global impression-severity scale ( CGI-SI) were used to evaluate the efficacy;treatment emergent symptom scale ( TESS) and rating scale for extrapyramidal side effects ( RSESE) were used to meas-ure the side effect before and 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks after the treatment. Results:There were no significant differences in the obvious effective rate (P>0. 05) and the effective rate (P>0. 05) between the two groups. From the 2nd week, the total scores of PANSS, positive symptom scores, negative symptoms scores and CGI-SI scores of Amisulpride group decreased more remarkably than those be-fore the treatment (P<0. 05 or P<0. 001). From the 4th week, the total and factor scores of PANSS and CGI-SI scores of Quetiapine group decreased more remarkably than those before the treatment (P<0. 05). At the end of the 4th (P<0. 05), 8th (P<0. 05), and 12th (P<0. 05) week, the negative symptoms scores of Amisulpride group were obviously better than those of Quetiapine group. Both groups had fewer adverse reactions. Conclusions:Amisulpride is an effective and safe drug in the treatment of chronic schizophrenia.