CAJ | 학술논문

梭罗与爱默生均以“自然书写”为世人所熟知，但在长期共同的超验主义理论话语规制下，两者“自然”观的差异混泯不清，因而在生态美学研究日盛的当下，关于两者“自然书写”的生态价值的品量也显得模糊不清。其实，以生态美学的“参与审美”为切入视角，可以看到梭罗的“自然书写”超越于爱默生之处，梭罗的自然观与爱默生自然观念的巨大差异也彰显无遗。更为重要的是，这种超越与差异，对当下人类面临的生态问题的解决有着深刻启示。
사라여애묵생균이“자연서사”위세인소숙지，단재장기공동적초험주의이론화어규제하，량자“자연”관적차이혼민불청，인이재생태미학연구일성적당하，관우량자“자연서사”적생태개치적품량야현득모호불청。기실，이생태미학적“삼여심미”위절입시각，가이간도사라적“자연서사”초월우애묵생지처，사라적자연관여애묵생자연관념적거대차이야창현무유。경위중요적시，저충초월여차이，대당하인류면림적생태문제적해결유착심각계시。
Thoreau and Emerson are well-known for “nature writing”.But within the long-term com-mon transcendental theoretical discourse constraints,the differences between them on the “natural”concept are not clear.Thus at present when the study on ecological aesthetics is becoming increasingly popular,ecological value of both “nature writing”is also blurry.Actually,from the perspective “par-ticipation aesthetics”in ecological aesthetics,Thoreau's “nature writing”transcends over Emerson's with the great differences shown between their ideas of nature.More importantly,this kind of tran-scendence and difference has a profound inspiration in solving the ecological problems confronted by mankind today.