福建警察学院学报
福建警察學院學報
복건경찰학원학보
JOURNAL OF FUJIAN POLICE ACADEMY
2015年
1期
67-72
,共6页
合同诈骗罪%诈骗罪%入罪标准%法条竞合%法律适用
閤同詐騙罪%詐騙罪%入罪標準%法條競閤%法律適用
합동사편죄%사편죄%입죄표준%법조경합%법률괄용
crime of contract fraud%crime of fraud%conviction standard%overlap of articles of law%applica-tion of law
司法解释和立案标准对合同诈骗罪入罪数额标准的设置高于诈骗罪,导致合同诈骗数额未达到合同诈骗罪入罪标准但达到诈骗罪入罪标准时是按无罪处理还是按普通诈骗罪论处存在争议。现有数额标准的设置具有合理性,统一数额标准不符合司法实践的要求。作无罪处理符合合同诈骗罪的立法目的,不会造成处罚上的漏洞;按普通诈骗罪论处会导致法律适用逻辑混乱,定罪量刑有失公允。“未达到特别法入罪标准但达到普通法入罪标准的行为作无罪处理”是法律适用的一般规则,除非法律明确规定此种情况下要按照普通法来处罚。
司法解釋和立案標準對閤同詐騙罪入罪數額標準的設置高于詐騙罪,導緻閤同詐騙數額未達到閤同詐騙罪入罪標準但達到詐騙罪入罪標準時是按無罪處理還是按普通詐騙罪論處存在爭議。現有數額標準的設置具有閤理性,統一數額標準不符閤司法實踐的要求。作無罪處理符閤閤同詐騙罪的立法目的,不會造成處罰上的漏洞;按普通詐騙罪論處會導緻法律適用邏輯混亂,定罪量刑有失公允。“未達到特彆法入罪標準但達到普通法入罪標準的行為作無罪處理”是法律適用的一般規則,除非法律明確規定此種情況下要按照普通法來處罰。
사법해석화입안표준대합동사편죄입죄수액표준적설치고우사편죄,도치합동사편수액미체도합동사편죄입죄표준단체도사편죄입죄표준시시안무죄처리환시안보통사편죄론처존재쟁의。현유수액표준적설치구유합이성,통일수액표준불부합사법실천적요구。작무죄처리부합합동사편죄적입법목적,불회조성처벌상적루동;안보통사편죄론처회도치법률괄용라집혼란,정죄양형유실공윤。“미체도특별법입죄표준단체도보통법입죄표준적행위작무죄처리”시법률괄용적일반규칙,제비법률명학규정차충정황하요안조보통법래처벌。
Since the standard of crime of contract fraud is more strict than that of crime of fraud , it is debatable whether the offender should be found innocent or be guilty of crime of fraud when the amount involved in contractual fraud is between the two standards .The existing settings of amount of the crime is reasonable;instead, the adoption of same standard would not meet the requirements of the judicial practice .Therefore, an innocent result will be consistent with the purpose of the crime of contract fraud , without any loopholes in punishment;on the contrary , a result of crime of fraud will lead to a logic chaos in legal application , as well as an inequal punishment .In a word, the behavior should be treated as innocent if it could not meet the conviction standard from special law but the one from general law , unless there is a definitely different expression in law .