科技管理研究
科技管理研究
과기관리연구
SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT RESEARCH
2015年
8期
220-226
,共7页
雾霾%庇古税%污染权
霧霾%庇古稅%汙染權
무매%비고세%오염권
haze%Pigouvian tax%pollution rights
通过对庇古税的征收和污染权交易两种思路的利弊进行比较分析,认为治理雾霾应采取混合策略,即以污染权的交易为主,当管理者对最优排放量误判而造成不良后果时,可以通过运用庇古税作为一种溢出机制来加以纠正。
通過對庇古稅的徵收和汙染權交易兩種思路的利弊進行比較分析,認為治理霧霾應採取混閤策略,即以汙染權的交易為主,噹管理者對最優排放量誤判而造成不良後果時,可以通過運用庇古稅作為一種溢齣機製來加以糾正。
통과대비고세적정수화오염권교역량충사로적리폐진행비교분석,인위치리무매응채취혼합책략,즉이오염권적교역위주,당관리자대최우배방량오판이조성불량후과시,가이통과운용비고세작위일충일출궤제래가이규정。
At present,the problem of environmental pollution in China is serious.Haze often occurs.And the scope of haze is gradually expanding.It has seriously affected people’s life.It poses a tough challenge on China's extensive econom-ic growth mode at the same time.The Chinese government attaches great importance to these problems,which also became an urgent problem needed to resolve.According to the Western governance policy instruments,economic means are essen-tial.There are usually two different ideas of governance,namely,Pigovian tax and pollution rights trading.Based on the comparative analysis of the pros and cons of the two approaches,this paper argues that mixed strategy management should be taken.It should be based on the pollution rights transaction.Using the Pigovian tax as an overflow mechanism for re-dress when managers make an error judgment on optimal emissions leads to adverse consequences.