中国地质
中國地質
중국지질
CHINESE GEOLOGY
2015年
2期
480-494
,共15页
龚正%李海兵%劳昌玲%唐力君%罗立强%李成龙%云锟%张佳佳%王雷振
龔正%李海兵%勞昌玲%唐力君%囉立彊%李成龍%雲錕%張佳佳%王雷振
공정%리해병%로창령%당력군%라립강%리성룡%운곤%장가가%왕뢰진
随钻流体异常%同震破碎带%非对称%汶川地震%映秀-北川断裂带%WFSD-1
隨鑽流體異常%同震破碎帶%非對稱%汶川地震%映秀-北川斷裂帶%WFSD-1
수찬류체이상%동진파쇄대%비대칭%문천지진%영수-북천단렬대%WFSD-1
real-time mud gas%co-seismic damage%asymmetric%Wenchuan Earthquake%Yinxiu-Beichuan fault zone%WFSD-1
地震过程中相当可观的一部分能量消耗于裂隙的活化与形成,来自汶川地震断裂带科学钻探一号孔(WFSD-1)的随钻流体表明,地震新形成的裂隙对应有较强的流体异常,它们为流体的入侵提供了良好的通道。随钻流体呈非对称性分布于主滑移面的两侧,主要的流体异常带集中在主滑移带下方须家河组顶部120 m范围内,该带中气体的含量以及变动的频率明显高于上部相同的宽度范围以及下部沉积岩层,来自地球物理测井的资料同样显示这一带破碎严重并伴随有大量水的侵入,暗示汶川地震形成的裂隙具有非对称性分布的特征。这一特征可能同时受控于断裂上盘彭灌杂岩与下盘须家河组岩层的力学性质差异以及地震破裂过程中形成的非对称性应力分布。
地震過程中相噹可觀的一部分能量消耗于裂隙的活化與形成,來自汶川地震斷裂帶科學鑽探一號孔(WFSD-1)的隨鑽流體錶明,地震新形成的裂隙對應有較彊的流體異常,它們為流體的入侵提供瞭良好的通道。隨鑽流體呈非對稱性分佈于主滑移麵的兩側,主要的流體異常帶集中在主滑移帶下方鬚傢河組頂部120 m範圍內,該帶中氣體的含量以及變動的頻率明顯高于上部相同的寬度範圍以及下部沉積巖層,來自地毬物理測井的資料同樣顯示這一帶破碎嚴重併伴隨有大量水的侵入,暗示汶川地震形成的裂隙具有非對稱性分佈的特徵。這一特徵可能同時受控于斷裂上盤彭灌雜巖與下盤鬚傢河組巖層的力學性質差異以及地震破裂過程中形成的非對稱性應力分佈。
지진과정중상당가관적일부분능량소모우렬극적활화여형성,래자문천지진단렬대과학찬탐일호공(WFSD-1)적수찬류체표명,지진신형성적렬극대응유교강적류체이상,타문위류체적입침제공료량호적통도。수찬류체정비대칭성분포우주활이면적량측,주요적류체이상대집중재주활이대하방수가하조정부120 m범위내,해대중기체적함량이급변동적빈솔명현고우상부상동적관도범위이급하부침적암층,래자지구물리측정적자료동양현시저일대파쇄엄중병반수유대량수적침입,암시문천지진형성적렬극구유비대칭성분포적특정。저일특정가능동시수공우단렬상반팽관잡암여하반수가하조암층적역학성질차이이급지진파렬과정중형성적비대칭성응력분포。
A considerable part of energy released during an earthquake is used to create fractures within the surrounding rocks. The real-time drilling mud gas from WFSD-1 shows that the fractures generated during the Wenchuan Earthquake coincide with large fluid peaks, and hence they are favorable passages for underground fluid migrations. The drilling mud gas distributes asymmetrically around the principal slip zone (PSZ), with the major anomaly zone emerging 120 m below the PSZ. Gas concentrations are much higher and vary more intensively than the upper 120 m. Additionally, the geophysical logs also prove that this zone is highly fractured and associated with serious water inrush, suggesting that the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake caused more damage to the footwall than to the hanging wall. The difference in rock strength between the volcanic hanging wall of Pengguan complex and the sedimentary footwall of Xujiahe Formation and the asymmetric stress during the rupture propagation might have contributed to the damage process.