中国继续医学教育
中國繼續醫學教育
중국계속의학교육
CHINA CONTINUING MEDICAL EDUCATION
2015年
8期
86-87
,共2页
胸腔镜%传统开胸术%创伤性血气胸
胸腔鏡%傳統開胸術%創傷性血氣胸
흉강경%전통개흉술%창상성혈기흉
Thoracoscopy%Traditional thoracotomy%Traumatic pneumothorax
目的:对比胸腔镜与传统开胸术治疗创伤性血气胸的安全性。方法选取100例患者随机分为观察组与对照组,每组50例患者,对照组采用传统开胸术治疗,对比两组治疗效果。结果观察组50例患者,总有效率为96.00%,对照组50例患者,总有效率为62.00%,两组对比有统计学差异(P<0.05)。结论对创伤性血气胸患者采用腹腔镜方法治疗临床效果显著,安全性高。
目的:對比胸腔鏡與傳統開胸術治療創傷性血氣胸的安全性。方法選取100例患者隨機分為觀察組與對照組,每組50例患者,對照組採用傳統開胸術治療,對比兩組治療效果。結果觀察組50例患者,總有效率為96.00%,對照組50例患者,總有效率為62.00%,兩組對比有統計學差異(P<0.05)。結論對創傷性血氣胸患者採用腹腔鏡方法治療臨床效果顯著,安全性高。
목적:대비흉강경여전통개흉술치료창상성혈기흉적안전성。방법선취100례환자수궤분위관찰조여대조조,매조50례환자,대조조채용전통개흉술치료,대비량조치료효과。결과관찰조50례환자,총유효솔위96.00%,대조조50례환자,총유효솔위62.00%,량조대비유통계학차이(P<0.05)。결론대창상성혈기흉환자채용복강경방법치료림상효과현저,안전성고。
Objective To compare VATS and conventional thoracotomy traumatic pneumothorax security.Methods 100 patients were randomly divided into observation group and control group of 50 patients in the control group using traditional thoracotomy treatment, compared two groups of treatment.Results 50 patients in the observation group, the total effective rate was 96.00% in the control group of 50 patients, the total effective rate was 62.00%, a significant difference between two groups (P<0.05).Conclusion Patients with traumatic pneumothorax laparoscopic method of treatment signiifcant clinical effect and safe.