CAJ | 학술논문

近年来，“中深湖”一词出现于国内部分地学类和石油类科技期刊中，根据所在文献的上下文推断，“中深湖”应属于地学中的沉积学范畴，对应于深湖(或半深湖和深湖)。“中深湖”本身含义不清，现有文献均未给出其定义，沉积学教科书上也没有出现过“中深湖”一词。因此，“中深湖”是一个错误的术语，不应继续使用。可根据资料条件和研究精度不同，规范使用“深湖”和“半深湖”这两个沉积学术语。
근년래，“중심호”일사출현우국내부분지학류화석유류과기기간중，근거소재문헌적상하문추단，“중심호”응속우지학중적침적학범주，대응우심호(혹반심호화심호)。“중심호”본신함의불청，현유문헌균미급출기정의，침적학교과서상야몰유출현과“중심호”일사。인차，“중심호”시일개착오적술어，불응계속사용。가근거자료조건화연구정도불동，규범사용“심호”화“반심호”저량개침적학술어。
A number of articles in some Chinese scientific journals used the terminology of“middle-deep lacustrine” in recent years, and the usage frequency is increasing. Based on analysis of the context, we propose that the so cal ed “middle-deep lacustrine” belongs to the category of sedimentology under geology, and is equivalent to deep lacustrine( or semi-deep lacustrine and deep lacustrine) . “middle-deep lacustrine” itself is literal y unclear. No article has proposed the definition of “middle-deep lacustrine”, and no textbook has presented the words of “middle-deep lacustrine”. “middle-deep lacustrine” is definitely a false terminology and should be out of usage. The normative and traditional terminologies of “deep lacustrine” and “semi-deep lacustrine” should be continual y used.