CAJ | 학술논문

目的：对比不同采血方法在临床血常规检验中的效果。方法择取2014年1～12月行血常规检测的120例健康受检者，按照不同采血方法作如下分组：甲组40例，行以肘前静脉取血；乙组40例，行以桡动脉取血；丙组40例，行以手指末梢取血。对血液作特别处理后统计相关参数，并对比重复性检测结果。结果甲、乙两组参数没有明显差别，P＞0.05，差异无统计学意义；丙组参数与甲、乙两组均有明显差别，P＜0.05，差异有统计学意义。这意味着末梢采血法具有最差的稳定性。结论采血方法的差异使得血常规检测结果也出现了明显的差异，本研究中末梢采血法的稳定性明显比另外两种差，而静脉采血法于可操作性上优于动脉采血法。
목적：대비불동채혈방법재림상혈상규검험중적효과。방법택취2014년1～12월행혈상규검측적120례건강수검자，안조불동채혈방법작여하분조：갑조40례，행이주전정맥취혈；을조40례，행이뇨동맥취혈；병조40례，행이수지말소취혈。대혈액작특별처리후통계상관삼수，병대비중복성검측결과。결과갑、을량조삼수몰유명현차별，P＞0.05，차이무통계학의의；병조삼수여갑、을량조균유명현차별，P＜0.05，차이유통계학의의。저의미착말소채혈법구유최차적은정성。결론채혈방법적차이사득혈상규검측결과야출현료명현적차이，본연구중말소채혈법적은정성명현비령외량충차，이정맥채혈법우가조작성상우우동맥채혈법。
Objective To compare the effects of different methods of blood testing in clinical blood.Methods Choose to take from January 2014 to December 2014 in the line of 120 healthy blood test subjects, according to the different methods of blood groups as follows: Group A 40 cases, the line to the antecubital vein blood, B 40 cases, the line to the radial artery blood, 40 cases in Group C, the line with a ifnger tip blood. After statistics for special treatment for blood-related parameters, and compare the reproducibility of test results.Results The two sets of parameters B no significant difference,P>0.05, the difference was not statistically significant, B Group C parameters in both groups significant difference, P<0.05, significant difference. This means that the peripheral blood sampling method has the worst stability.Conclusion The method of making the difference in blood blood test result was also a significant difference in the stability of the present study of peripheral blood were signiifcantly higher than the other two methods is poor, while arterial blood venous blood collection method is superior to the operability, it is recommended clinical application.