健康研究
健康研究
건강연구
HEALTH RESEARCH
2015年
2期
151-152,158
,共3页
Nobel(诺贝尔)种植体%磁性覆盖义齿%下颌牙列缺失%应用价值
Nobel(諾貝爾)種植體%磁性覆蓋義齒%下頜牙列缺失%應用價值
Nobel(낙패이)충식체%자성복개의치%하합아렬결실%응용개치
Nobel implant%magnetic repair%edentulous mandible%clinical effects
目的:研究Nobel(诺贝尔)种植体磁性修复下颌牙列缺失的应用价值。方法63例下牙列缺失的患者分为全口义齿组(29例)和种植体组(34例),比较两组患者的治疗满意度和患者的咀嚼功能,种植体组患者治疗后1、3、6、12、24、36个月各复诊一次,检查种植体有无脱落。结果34例患者各植入3~5个种植体不等,所有患者共植入129个种植体,其中2个种植体失败。全口义齿组患者满意度79.31%,种植体组患者满意度94.12%,两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);种植体组患者杏仁和枣的咀嚼率明显高于全口义齿组(P<0.05)。复查结束后种植体存留率98.43%。结论 Nobel(诺贝尔)种植体可明显提高患者的咀嚼率,种植体脱落率较低,对患者影响小。
目的:研究Nobel(諾貝爾)種植體磁性脩複下頜牙列缺失的應用價值。方法63例下牙列缺失的患者分為全口義齒組(29例)和種植體組(34例),比較兩組患者的治療滿意度和患者的咀嚼功能,種植體組患者治療後1、3、6、12、24、36箇月各複診一次,檢查種植體有無脫落。結果34例患者各植入3~5箇種植體不等,所有患者共植入129箇種植體,其中2箇種植體失敗。全口義齒組患者滿意度79.31%,種植體組患者滿意度94.12%,兩組差異無統計學意義(P>0.05);種植體組患者杏仁和棘的咀嚼率明顯高于全口義齒組(P<0.05)。複查結束後種植體存留率98.43%。結論 Nobel(諾貝爾)種植體可明顯提高患者的咀嚼率,種植體脫落率較低,對患者影響小。
목적:연구Nobel(낙패이)충식체자성수복하합아렬결실적응용개치。방법63례하아렬결실적환자분위전구의치조(29례)화충식체조(34례),비교량조환자적치료만의도화환자적저작공능,충식체조환자치료후1、3、6、12、24、36개월각복진일차,검사충식체유무탈락。결과34례환자각식입3~5개충식체불등,소유환자공식입129개충식체,기중2개충식체실패。전구의치조환자만의도79.31%,충식체조환자만의도94.12%,량조차이무통계학의의(P>0.05);충식체조환자행인화조적저작솔명현고우전구의치조(P<0.05)。복사결속후충식체존류솔98.43%。결론 Nobel(낙패이)충식체가명현제고환자적저작솔,충식체탈락솔교저,대환자영향소。
Objective To examine the clinical effects of Nobel Biocare magnetic implant as a technology for repairing edentulousm andible.Method 63 patients with problems in edentulous mandible admitted to our hospital during the period from February 2009 to February2011 were chosen as the subjects of study and divided into two groups, one group of 29 cases with complete denture and the other group of 34 cases having undertaken magnetic implant.Patients 'satisfaction and patient masticatory function of the two groups were compared.Follow-up check was conducted for the patients in the implant treatment group 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months after treatment.Findings All together 129 implants were conducted for 34 patients, each having 3 implants at least or 5 implants at most.Two implants were found to be unsuccessful.Satisfaction of patients in the complete denture group was 79.31%, and that of the implant treatment group was 94.12%.No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups ( P >0.05 );Mastication of apricot and jujube of the implant group was significantly better than that of the complete denture group ( P<0.05).After the review, implant survival rate was 98.43%.Conclusion Nobel Biocare magnetic implant can obviously improve the chewing ability of patients and the implant failure rate is low.Furthermore, the negative effect on the patients is weaker.Therefore, the technology can serve as a desirable therapy for the disease.