医药导报
醫藥導報
의약도보
HERALD OF MEDICINE
2015年
4期
534-537
,共4页
王晨%刘元元%丁玉峰%艾冬云
王晨%劉元元%丁玉峰%艾鼕雲
왕신%류원원%정옥봉%애동운
抗菌药物%合理使用%评价标准
抗菌藥物%閤理使用%評價標準
항균약물%합리사용%평개표준
Antibacterial drugs%Rational use%Evaluation criteria
目的:探讨卫生部抗菌药物临床应用监测网病历用药合理性评价意见(纸质)表的评价标准。方法依据《抗菌药物临床应用指导原则》和《卫生部办公厅关于抗菌药物临床应用管理有关问题的通知》(卫办医政发[2009]38号)的相关规定,结合抗菌药物在临床使用的实际情况,参考相关法规、文件、指南,对意见表中的评价项目进行解释。结果经过对评价标准相关问题的探讨,有助于卫生部抗菌药物临床应用监测网各成员单位对意见表评价标准的理解,使各单位评价结果更加趋于一致。结论探讨评价标准有助于降低评价结果偏差,使评价过程更加规范化和标准化。
目的:探討衛生部抗菌藥物臨床應用鑑測網病歷用藥閤理性評價意見(紙質)錶的評價標準。方法依據《抗菌藥物臨床應用指導原則》和《衛生部辦公廳關于抗菌藥物臨床應用管理有關問題的通知》(衛辦醫政髮[2009]38號)的相關規定,結閤抗菌藥物在臨床使用的實際情況,參攷相關法規、文件、指南,對意見錶中的評價項目進行解釋。結果經過對評價標準相關問題的探討,有助于衛生部抗菌藥物臨床應用鑑測網各成員單位對意見錶評價標準的理解,使各單位評價結果更加趨于一緻。結論探討評價標準有助于降低評價結果偏差,使評價過程更加規範化和標準化。
목적:탐토위생부항균약물림상응용감측망병력용약합이성평개의견(지질)표적평개표준。방법의거《항균약물림상응용지도원칙》화《위생부판공청관우항균약물림상응용관리유관문제적통지》(위판의정발[2009]38호)적상관규정,결합항균약물재림상사용적실제정황,삼고상관법규、문건、지남,대의견표중적평개항목진행해석。결과경과대평개표준상관문제적탐토,유조우위생부항균약물림상응용감측망각성원단위대의견표평개표준적리해,사각단위평개결과경가추우일치。결론탐토평개표준유조우강저평개결과편차,사평개과정경가규범화화표준화。
Objective To discuss the criteria for the evaluation of rational antibiotic drug use in medical cases ( paper edition) of the antimicrobial agent clinical application monitoring network administered by The Ministry of Health. Methods Based on the relevant provisions from The guiding principles for clinical applications of antibacterial drugs and“The notice by the General Office of the Ministry of Health on related questions of clinical application management of antibacterial drugs” ( the General Office of the Ministry of Health [2009] NO. 38), combined with the actual situations of antibacterial drugs in clinical use, relevant laws, regulations, and guidances, the evaluation items in the feedback form were studied. Results The study, to a certain extent, contributed to the understanding of evaluation criteria on antimicrobial agent use in clinical application monitoring network of The Ministry of Health for monitoring net members by investigating related questions regarding the evaluation criteria, and will make the evaluation results more consistent. Conclusion The discussion of the evaluation criteria can reduce the deviation of the evaluation results and make the evaluation process more standardized.