延边医学
延邊醫學
연변의학
YAN BIAN YI XUE
2015年
13期
221-222
,共2页
品管圈%手术器械准备完善率%应用价值
品管圈%手術器械準備完善率%應用價值
품관권%수술기계준비완선솔%응용개치
Quality control circle (QCC)%Preparation rate of surgical instruments%Application value
目的：：探讨品管圈在提高手术器械准备完善率中的应用价值。方法：分析我院自2014年9月-2014年12月手术室采取品管圈（Quality Control Circle QCC）骨科器械准备模式行骨科手术患者74例，与我院自2014年5月-2014年8月手术室常规骨科器械准备模式行骨科手术患者74例相比，比较患者器械准备完善率及手术医生的满意度。结果：采取QCC组患者的器械准备完善率为95.95%，与常规准备组相比（80.18%）， QCC组患者器械准备完善率更高(p<0.05)。常规准备组手术医生满意度为78.38%，QCC组手术医生满意度为97.30%，与常规组相比，QCC组手术医生的满意度更高，经分析具有统计学差异（p<0.05）。结论：在手术器械准备中采取品管圈的方法取得了满意效果，降低了现有的器械打包不规范、手术器械规格准备不完善、手术器械零部件损坏等问题。充分调动了护理人员的积极性、创造性，确保护理人员更加主动的为患者服务。
目的：：探討品管圈在提高手術器械準備完善率中的應用價值。方法：分析我院自2014年9月-2014年12月手術室採取品管圈（Quality Control Circle QCC）骨科器械準備模式行骨科手術患者74例，與我院自2014年5月-2014年8月手術室常規骨科器械準備模式行骨科手術患者74例相比，比較患者器械準備完善率及手術醫生的滿意度。結果：採取QCC組患者的器械準備完善率為95.95%，與常規準備組相比（80.18%）， QCC組患者器械準備完善率更高(p<0.05)。常規準備組手術醫生滿意度為78.38%，QCC組手術醫生滿意度為97.30%，與常規組相比，QCC組手術醫生的滿意度更高，經分析具有統計學差異（p<0.05）。結論：在手術器械準備中採取品管圈的方法取得瞭滿意效果，降低瞭現有的器械打包不規範、手術器械規格準備不完善、手術器械零部件損壞等問題。充分調動瞭護理人員的積極性、創造性，確保護理人員更加主動的為患者服務。
목적：：탐토품관권재제고수술기계준비완선솔중적응용개치。방법：분석아원자2014년9월-2014년12월수술실채취품관권（Quality Control Circle QCC）골과기계준비모식행골과수술환자74례，여아원자2014년5월-2014년8월수술실상규골과기계준비모식행골과수술환자74례상비，비교환자기계준비완선솔급수술의생적만의도。결과：채취QCC조환자적기계준비완선솔위95.95%，여상규준비조상비（80.18%）， QCC조환자기계준비완선솔경고(p<0.05)。상규준비조수술의생만의도위78.38%，QCC조수술의생만의도위97.30%，여상규조상비，QCC조수술의생적만의도경고，경분석구유통계학차이（p<0.05）。결론：재수술기계준비중채취품관권적방법취득료만의효과，강저료현유적기계타포불규범、수술기계규격준비불완선、수술기계령부건손배등문제。충분조동료호리인원적적겁성、창조성，학보호리인원경가주동적위환자복무。
Objective:To explore the application value of quality control circle (QCC) in the preparation rate of surgical instruments. Methods:74 cases of patients were given orthopedic surgery with orthopedic instrument of QCC preparation mode in operating room from September 2014 to December 2014. And 74 cases of patients who were given orthopedic surgery with orthopedic instrument of conventional preparation mode in operating room from May 2014 to August 2014 were selected as the controls. Preparation rate of surgical instruments and satisfactory rate of surgeons were compared. Results:Preparation rate of surgical instruments was 95.95%in QCC group while 80.18%in control group. Preparation rate of surgical instruments was higher in QCC group (p<0.05). Satisfactory rate of surgeons was 78.38%in control group while 97.30%in QCC group. Compared to the control group, satisfactory rate of surgeons was high-er in QCC group, with statistical difference after analysis (p<0.05). Conclusions:QCC mode has achieved satisfactory effects for surgical instrument preparation and reduces the existing problems such as irregular equipment package, imperfect surgical instrument specifications and injured surgical instrument parts. This method can ful y arouse the enthusiasm and creativity of nursing staff, and ensure nursing staff to more actively serve the patients.
