烟草科技
煙草科技
연초과기
TOBACCO SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
2015年
4期
60-65
,共6页
许冰洋%朱文魁%潘广乐%申玉军%李斌%于川芳
許冰洋%硃文魁%潘廣樂%申玉軍%李斌%于川芳
허빙양%주문괴%반엄악%신옥군%리빈%우천방
叶丝%干燥%内孔容积%孔径分布%收缩率
葉絲%榦燥%內孔容積%孔徑分佈%收縮率
협사%간조%내공용적%공경분포%수축솔
Cut strip%Drying%Pore volume%Pore size distribution%Shrinkage
为了探明不同干燥方式下叶丝孔隙结构的变化规律,采用实验室滚筒和下行床干燥装置,考察了烤烟和白肋烟叶丝干燥过程中内孔容积、叶丝体积、孔径分布及孔隙形貌的变化特征。结果表明:①不同干燥方式下叶丝内孔容积均存在明显的收缩,且烤烟叶丝内孔容积收缩程度高于白肋烟;在含水率25%到15%的主要脱水阶段,叶丝下行床干燥过程内孔容积的收缩明显低于滚筒干燥。②烤烟和白肋烟叶丝体积收缩率与含水率近似为线性关系,干燥至10%含水率时叶丝体积收缩率达25%左右;不同干燥方式对叶丝体积收缩率的变化影响不大。③烤烟和白肋烟叶丝的孔隙体积主要分布在30μm以上的大孔区域;与滚筒干燥相比,下行床干燥方式下两种叶丝在1~10μm直径范围内的孔隙有所增加。
為瞭探明不同榦燥方式下葉絲孔隙結構的變化規律,採用實驗室滾筒和下行床榦燥裝置,攷察瞭烤煙和白肋煙葉絲榦燥過程中內孔容積、葉絲體積、孔徑分佈及孔隙形貌的變化特徵。結果錶明:①不同榦燥方式下葉絲內孔容積均存在明顯的收縮,且烤煙葉絲內孔容積收縮程度高于白肋煙;在含水率25%到15%的主要脫水階段,葉絲下行床榦燥過程內孔容積的收縮明顯低于滾筒榦燥。②烤煙和白肋煙葉絲體積收縮率與含水率近似為線性關繫,榦燥至10%含水率時葉絲體積收縮率達25%左右;不同榦燥方式對葉絲體積收縮率的變化影響不大。③烤煙和白肋煙葉絲的孔隙體積主要分佈在30μm以上的大孔區域;與滾筒榦燥相比,下行床榦燥方式下兩種葉絲在1~10μm直徑範圍內的孔隙有所增加。
위료탐명불동간조방식하협사공극결구적변화규률,채용실험실곤통화하행상간조장치,고찰료고연화백륵연협사간조과정중내공용적、협사체적、공경분포급공극형모적변화특정。결과표명:①불동간조방식하협사내공용적균존재명현적수축,차고연협사내공용적수축정도고우백륵연;재함수솔25%도15%적주요탈수계단,협사하행상간조과정내공용적적수축명현저우곤통간조。②고연화백륵연협사체적수축솔여함수솔근사위선성관계,간조지10%함수솔시협사체적수축솔체25%좌우;불동간조방식대협사체적수축솔적변화영향불대。③고연화백륵연협사적공극체적주요분포재30μm이상적대공구역;여곤통간조상비,하행상간조방식하량충협사재1~10μm직경범위내적공극유소증가。
In order to investigate the variation of pore structure in cut strips dried by different drying means, the variation in pore volume, pore size distribution, pore shape and volume of flue-cured and burley tobaccos were dried by a laboratory cylinder dryer and a downflow bed dryer. The results showed that: 1) The pore volume in tobacco dried by different drying means shrank obviously, and the shrinkage of pore volume in flue-cured tobacco was higher than that of burley tobacco. At the stage the moisture content reduced from 25% to 15%, the shrinkage of pore volume in tobacco dried in a downflow bed was remarkably lower than that in a cylinder during drying. 2) The shrinkage of tobacco volume roughly proportioned to the decrease of moisture content in tobacco, the shrinkage reached up to 25% at the moisture content of 10%. Drying means did not affect the shrinkage of tobacco volume significantly. 3) The majority of pores in tobacco were macropores above 30 μm in diameter. Comparing with cylinder drying, more pores of 1-10 μm in diameter emerged in tobacco dried in a downflow bed.