CAJ | 학술논문

目的：分析在治疗女性月经过多的过程中运用曼月乐和妈富隆的疗效对比。方法随机从2010年1月～2013年6月来我院治疗月经过多的患者中选出110例，随机平均分为2组，I小组采用曼月乐进行治疗，II小组采用口服妈富隆类药物治疗。研究两组治疗有效率和月经量改变情况。结果通过对患者治疗结果进行分析后显示，在对治疗后第6、12个月时Ⅰ小组疗效明显优于Ⅱ小组，同时月经控制量也要优于Ⅱ小组。另外根据出院后随访情况显示，Ⅰ小组患者治疗失败率要低于Ⅱ小组，两组患者治疗后性生活满意度没有较大差异。结论在对月经过多患者进行治疗时，利用曼月乐起到的效果要好于口服类药物，同时能够有效避免闭经情况的出现，提高患者治疗后的生活质量。
목적：분석재치료녀성월경과다적과정중운용만월악화마부륭적료효대비。방법수궤종2010년1월～2013년6월래아원치료월경과다적환자중선출110례，수궤평균분위2조，I소조채용만월악진행치료，II소조채용구복마부륭류약물치료。연구량조치료유효솔화월경량개변정황。결과통과대환자치료결과진행분석후현시，재대치료후제6、12개월시Ⅰ소조료효명현우우Ⅱ소조，동시월경공제량야요우우Ⅱ소조。령외근거출원후수방정황현시，Ⅰ소조환자치료실패솔요저우Ⅱ소조，량조환자치료후성생활만의도몰유교대차이。결론재대월경과다환자진행치료시，이용만월악기도적효과요호우구복류약물，동시능구유효피면폐경정황적출현，제고환자치료후적생활질량。
Objective To analyze mirena and manfuelon comparative effectiveness for women menorrhagia frequent process. Methods To seize 110 cases in our hospital from 2010.1 to 2013.6, divide into Group I and Group II, the former used mirena treatment, the later used manfuelon treatment. 2 groups efficient and menstrual quantity change were analyzed. Results It showed that, at 6 and 12 months after treatment, patients’ treatment effect and menorrhagia control effect in Group I was better than the one in Group II. According to follow-up after discharge, patients treatment failure rate in Group I was lower than one in Group II. Conclusion In treatment of menorrhagia patients, mirena effect will be better than manfuelon effect, be able to effectively avoid amenorrhoea condition occurrence, and improve patients’ life quality.