CAJ | 학술논문

目的：探讨腹腔镜切口疝修补术的临床效果。方法将104例腹壁切口疝患者随机分为观察组、对照组各52例。对照组采用传统的修补术治疗，观察组采用腹腔镜修补术治疗。比较2组手术情况、术后恢复情况、术后并发症等情况。结果观察组手术时间、术后下床活动时间、术后排气时间、切口愈合及肠功能恢复时间均短于对照组（P均＜0.01）；术后切口血肿、肺部感染、肠梗阻、复发等不良反应发生率低于对照组（P均＜0.05）。结论腹腔镜修补术治疗腹壁切口疝效果明显优于传统手术，具有一定的临床价值。
목적：탐토복강경절구산수보술적림상효과。방법장104례복벽절구산환자수궤분위관찰조、대조조각52례。대조조채용전통적수보술치료，관찰조채용복강경수보술치료。비교2조수술정황、술후회복정황、술후병발증등정황。결과관찰조수술시간、술후하상활동시간、술후배기시간、절구유합급장공능회복시간균단우대조조（P균＜0.01）；술후절구혈종、폐부감염、장경조、복발등불량반응발생솔저우대조조（P균＜0.05）。결론복강경수보술치료복벽절구산효과명현우우전통수술，구유일정적림상개치。
Objective To study the clinical effect of laparoscopic incisional hernia repair. Methods 104 patients with incision hernia of abdominal wall were randomly divided into observation group and the control group (n=52). The control group with traditional repair treatment, the observation group treated by laparoscopic repair. Compare two groups surgery, postoperative recovery, postoperative complications, and so on and so forth. Results The observation group operation time, postoperative bed time, postoperative exhaust time, incision healing and bowel function recovery time is shorter than the control group (all P<0.01); Postoperative incision hematoma, pulmonary infection, intestinal obstruction, recurrent incidence of adverse reactions, such as lower than the control group (all P<0.05). Conclusion Laparoscopic repair treatment effect of incision hernia of abdominal wall is better than traditional surgery, has a certain clinical value.