西南大学学报(自然科学版)
西南大學學報(自然科學版)
서남대학학보(자연과학판)
JOURNAL OF SOUTHWEST AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY(NATURAL SCIENCE)
2015年
4期
67-72
,共6页
参照性交流%个人学习%学习效果%选择性注意
參照性交流%箇人學習%學習效果%選擇性註意
삼조성교류%개인학습%학습효과%선택성주의
referential communication%individual learning%learning effect%selective attention
以144名大学生为被试,使用4特征复杂关系类别虚拟材料,创设参照性交流和个人学习方式,通过控制功能预测学习程度,对维度选择中选择性注意进行比较,探查参照性交流和个人学习选择性注意的差异特点,结果发现:成绩组间维度选择整体结果差异有统计学意义,且低、中成绩组下,参照条件维度选择的平均数高于个人条件,差异有统计学意义;个人条件下成绩组间有关维度选择结果差异有统计学意义,但参照条件下中成绩组有关维度选择的平均数高于高成绩组,差异有统计学意义,学习方式间的差异特点与维度整体选择结果一致;成绩组间无关维度选择结果差异有统计学意义,但学习方式间差异无统计学意义。
以144名大學生為被試,使用4特徵複雜關繫類彆虛擬材料,創設參照性交流和箇人學習方式,通過控製功能預測學習程度,對維度選擇中選擇性註意進行比較,探查參照性交流和箇人學習選擇性註意的差異特點,結果髮現:成績組間維度選擇整體結果差異有統計學意義,且低、中成績組下,參照條件維度選擇的平均數高于箇人條件,差異有統計學意義;箇人條件下成績組間有關維度選擇結果差異有統計學意義,但參照條件下中成績組有關維度選擇的平均數高于高成績組,差異有統計學意義,學習方式間的差異特點與維度整體選擇結果一緻;成績組間無關維度選擇結果差異有統計學意義,但學習方式間差異無統計學意義。
이144명대학생위피시,사용4특정복잡관계유별허의재료,창설삼조성교류화개인학습방식,통과공제공능예측학습정도,대유도선택중선택성주의진행비교,탐사삼조성교류화개인학습선택성주의적차이특점,결과발현:성적조간유도선택정체결과차이유통계학의의,차저、중성적조하,삼조조건유도선택적평균수고우개인조건,차이유통계학의의;개인조건하성적조간유관유도선택결과차이유통계학의의,단삼조조건하중성적조유관유도선택적평균수고우고성적조,차이유통계학의의,학습방식간적차이특점여유도정체선택결과일치;성적조간무관유도선택결과차이유통계학의의,단학습방식간차이무통계학의의。
One hundred and forty‐four undergraduate students participated in the current study .The study designed referential communication and individual learning by four features virtual alien as experimental materials ,and discussed the differences in selective attention between referential communication and indi‐vidual learning by controlling the learning degree .Significant differences were found to exist among the re‐sults of dimension selection under the condition of score groups .Except for the lower‐score group ,the av‐erage numbers of biological dimension selected under the condition of referential communication were high‐ly significantly higher than those under the individual condition .Under the individual condition ,the results of relative dimension showed significant difference among score groups .Under the condition of referential communication ,the average number of relative dimension selected in the middle‐score group was signifi‐cantly higher than that in the high‐score group .The different characteristics of relative dimension among learning manners accorded with those of dimension selection .The differences of non‐relative dimensional results were significant among score groups ,but there were no significant differences between learning manners .