CAJ | 학술논문

采用自发式顿悟范式，比较被试在实验室条件下解决何种类型的中文远距离联想任务（CRAT ）时存在更明显的顿悟，结果发现：①目标字为多音字的CRAT解决率、反应时、顿悟率与目标字为单音字条件时的差异无统计学意义．目标字是否为多音字（HT）不是判断真假顿悟的良好指标．②较之3个线索字互相不能组成词的CRAT ，线索字可以组成词的CRAT项目的解决率更低、反应时更长、顿悟率更高，存在更明显的问题重构，是更好的研究顿悟的材料．
채용자발식돈오범식，비교피시재실험실조건하해결하충류형적중문원거리련상임무（CRAT ）시존재경명현적돈오，결과발현：①목표자위다음자적CRAT해결솔、반응시、돈오솔여목표자위단음자조건시적차이무통계학의의．목표자시부위다음자（HT）불시판단진가돈오적량호지표．②교지3개선색자호상불능조성사적CRAT ，선색자가이조성사적CRAT항목적해결솔경저、반응시경장、돈오솔경고，존재경명현적문제중구，시경호적연구돈오적재료．
In this study ,spontaneous insight paradigm was adopted to explore what kind of Chinese remote associate task (CRAT ) possesses more obvious insight traits .The research discovered that there was no significant difference in solving rate ,RTs and insight rate between CRAT with heteronymous characters as targets (HT) and CRAT with normal characters as targets (NC) ,thus suggesting that whether the target is heteronymous characters or not is not an ideal method for identifying the insight process .Compared with the CRAT having three clue characters incapable of forming words ,the CRAT with clue characters capable of forming words was found to have lower solving rate ,slower RTs and higher insight rate ,thus sugges‐ting that the process of solving CRAT with clue characters capable of forming words has more obvious cognitive reconstruction and is the better material in the study of insight .