医学与哲学
醫學與哲學
의학여철학
MEDICINE AND PHILOSOPHY
2015年
8期
37-42
,共6页
徐鹏慧%高冠民%张蕾蕾%李艳敏%刘升云%阚全程
徐鵬慧%高冠民%張蕾蕾%李豔敏%劉升雲%闞全程
서붕혜%고관민%장뢰뢰%리염민%류승운%감전정
强直性脊柱炎%肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂%非甾体抗炎药
彊直性脊柱炎%腫瘤壞死因子抑製劑%非甾體抗炎藥
강직성척주염%종류배사인자억제제%비치체항염약
ankylosing spondylitis%TNF blockers%NSAIDs
评估肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)抑制剂和非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)治疗强直性脊柱炎(AS)的疗效。检索并纳入2014年7月前TNF抑制剂或NSAIDs治疗AS且与安慰剂对照的随机对照试验。共纳入17篇研究,其中12篇评估TNF抑制剂,5篇评估NSAIDs。Meta分析结果显示:在“疼痛”和“患者总体评估”方面,治疗效果在TNF抑制剂组和NSAIDs组是中等或者大。在“机体功能”方面,TNF抑制剂组治疗效果是大,NSAIDs组是小。在“急性时相反应物”方面,TNF 抑制剂组效应量是中等的,而NSAIDs对“急性时相反应物”无显著影响。在“脊柱活动度”方面,NSAIDs的疗效无统计学意义。不同方面很难比较TNF抑制剂和NSAIDs的疗效,但 TNF抑制剂较NSAIDs在改善患者机体功能、降低炎症反应方面更有效。TNF抑制剂是否有改善病情作用及与NSAIDs药物如何联合延缓AS结构破坏,仍需高质量、大样本、长期的临床试验来验证。
評估腫瘤壞死因子(TNF)抑製劑和非甾體抗炎藥(NSAIDs)治療彊直性脊柱炎(AS)的療效。檢索併納入2014年7月前TNF抑製劑或NSAIDs治療AS且與安慰劑對照的隨機對照試驗。共納入17篇研究,其中12篇評估TNF抑製劑,5篇評估NSAIDs。Meta分析結果顯示:在“疼痛”和“患者總體評估”方麵,治療效果在TNF抑製劑組和NSAIDs組是中等或者大。在“機體功能”方麵,TNF抑製劑組治療效果是大,NSAIDs組是小。在“急性時相反應物”方麵,TNF 抑製劑組效應量是中等的,而NSAIDs對“急性時相反應物”無顯著影響。在“脊柱活動度”方麵,NSAIDs的療效無統計學意義。不同方麵很難比較TNF抑製劑和NSAIDs的療效,但 TNF抑製劑較NSAIDs在改善患者機體功能、降低炎癥反應方麵更有效。TNF抑製劑是否有改善病情作用及與NSAIDs藥物如何聯閤延緩AS結構破壞,仍需高質量、大樣本、長期的臨床試驗來驗證。
평고종류배사인자(TNF)억제제화비치체항염약(NSAIDs)치료강직성척주염(AS)적료효。검색병납입2014년7월전TNF억제제혹NSAIDs치료AS차여안위제대조적수궤대조시험。공납입17편연구,기중12편평고TNF억제제,5편평고NSAIDs。Meta분석결과현시:재“동통”화“환자총체평고”방면,치료효과재TNF억제제조화NSAIDs조시중등혹자대。재“궤체공능”방면,TNF억제제조치료효과시대,NSAIDs조시소。재“급성시상반응물”방면,TNF 억제제조효응량시중등적,이NSAIDs대“급성시상반응물”무현저영향。재“척주활동도”방면,NSAIDs적료효무통계학의의。불동방면흔난비교TNF억제제화NSAIDs적료효,단 TNF억제제교NSAIDs재개선환자궤체공능、강저염증반응방면경유효。TNF억제제시부유개선병정작용급여NSAIDs약물여하연합연완AS결구파배,잉수고질량、대양본、장기적림상시험래험증。
To evaluate the efficacy of TNF blockers and anti‐inflammatory agents (NSAIDs) in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS ) . We perform a meta‐analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs ) of TNF blockers and anti‐inflammatory agents (NSAIDs) in patients with ankylosing spondylitis reported up to July ,2014 .Altogether ,17 articles were included in the analysis ,12 selected RCTs evaluating anti‐TNF ,and 5 evaluating NSAIDs RCTs .For the domains pain and patient's global assessment ,the treatment effect was large or medium for both TNF blockers and NSAIDs .For the domain physical function ,the effect of TNF blockers was large and NSAIDs on physical function is medium .For the domain acute‐phase reactants ,the effect of TNF blockers was medium ,whereas NSAIDs had no significant effect on acute‐phase reactants .Finally ,for the domain mobility ,the effect size of NSAIDs was small and not significant .The results suggests that it is difficult to campare the efficacy of TNF blockers and NSAIDs in different domains ,but TNF blockers are more effective in improving physical function and decreasing the inflammatory parameters compared with NSAIDs . More high quality ,large sample ,long‐term clinical trial are required to demonstrate the disease‐modifing effect of TNF blockers and how to combined TNF blockers and NSAIDs in improving structural progression in AS .