海南医学
海南醫學
해남의학
HAINAN MEDICAL JOURNAL
2015年
7期
1052-1054
,共3页
宫腹腔镜%输卵管妊娠%间质部妊娠
宮腹腔鏡%輸卵管妊娠%間質部妊娠
궁복강경%수란관임신%간질부임신
Laparoscopy%Tubal pregnancy%Interstitial tubal pregnancy
目的:探讨宫腹腔镜联合方案和常规方案对宫角妊娠和输卵管间质部妊娠患者的临床诊疗效果。方法将我院2009年1月至2013年12月期间收治的39例宫角妊娠和间质部妊娠患者按随机数字表法分为观察组19例和对照组20例,观察组患者采用宫腹腔镜联合诊治,而对照组患者则采用常规方案治疗,评价两组患者的临床治疗效果。结果观察组患者的治疗成功率为94.7%(18/19),而对照组为80.0%(16/20),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组患者的手术时间、住院天数、术中出血、切口长度、止痛时间及术后月经恢复时间均明显优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论宫腹腔镜联合方案诊治宫角妊娠和输卵管间质部妊娠患者的临床治疗效果比常规方案更好,建议临床上优先选择使用。
目的:探討宮腹腔鏡聯閤方案和常規方案對宮角妊娠和輸卵管間質部妊娠患者的臨床診療效果。方法將我院2009年1月至2013年12月期間收治的39例宮角妊娠和間質部妊娠患者按隨機數字錶法分為觀察組19例和對照組20例,觀察組患者採用宮腹腔鏡聯閤診治,而對照組患者則採用常規方案治療,評價兩組患者的臨床治療效果。結果觀察組患者的治療成功率為94.7%(18/19),而對照組為80.0%(16/20),差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);觀察組患者的手術時間、住院天數、術中齣血、切口長度、止痛時間及術後月經恢複時間均明顯優于對照組,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論宮腹腔鏡聯閤方案診治宮角妊娠和輸卵管間質部妊娠患者的臨床治療效果比常規方案更好,建議臨床上優先選擇使用。
목적:탐토궁복강경연합방안화상규방안대궁각임신화수란관간질부임신환자적림상진료효과。방법장아원2009년1월지2013년12월기간수치적39례궁각임신화간질부임신환자안수궤수자표법분위관찰조19례화대조조20례,관찰조환자채용궁복강경연합진치,이대조조환자칙채용상규방안치료,평개량조환자적림상치료효과。결과관찰조환자적치료성공솔위94.7%(18/19),이대조조위80.0%(16/20),차이유통계학의의(P<0.05);관찰조환자적수술시간、주원천수、술중출혈、절구장도、지통시간급술후월경회복시간균명현우우대조조,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론궁복강경연합방안진치궁각임신화수란관간질부임신환자적림상치료효과비상규방안경호,건의림상상우선선택사용。
Objective To investigate the clinical effect of laparoscopy combined with hysteroscopy in the di-agnosis and treatment of cornual pregnancy and interstitial tubal pregnancy patients. Methods Thrity-nine patients of cornual pregnancy and interstitial tubal pregnancy admitted to our hospital from January 2009 to December 2013 were randomly divided into observation group (19 cases) and control group (20 cases). The observation group was treated by laparoscopy combined with hysteroscopy, while the control group applied conventional therapy. The clinical therapeutic effect of two groups was evaluated. Results The success rate was 94.7%(18/19) in the observation group and 80%in the control group (16/20), with statistically significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05). The observation group was significantly better than the control group in operation time, length of hospital stay, intraopera-tive blood loss, incision length, postoperative analgesic time and menstrual recovery time, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). Conclusion The clinical therapeutic effect of laparoscopy combined with hysteroscopy for treatment of corneal pregnancy and interstitial tubal pregnancy is better than conventional schemes, which is recom-mended for clinical application.