实用临床医药杂志
實用臨床醫藥雜誌
실용림상의약잡지
JOURNAL OF JIANGSU CLINICAL MEDICINE
2015年
8期
63-65
,共3页
结肠水疗%传统灌肠治疗%功能性便秘%护理
結腸水療%傳統灌腸治療%功能性便祕%護理
결장수료%전통관장치료%공능성편비%호리
colon hydrotherapy%traditional enema%functional constipation%nursing
目的:分析结肠水疗与传统吊袋灌肠治疗功能性便秘(FC)的效果和疗效持续时间№总结护理体会。方法将65例 FC 患者随机分为结肠水疗组(34例)和传统灌肠组(31例),前组应用 GCJ-K 型电脑灌肠机进行水疗,后组使用传统灌肠袋行大量不保留灌肠,并分别辅以相应的护理;观察2组患者便秘改善情况,并运用便秘患者生活质量问卷(PAC-QOL)积分比较,评价治疗效果和疗效持续时间。结果结肠水疗组有效率91.2%,传统灌肠组有效率61.3%,2者差异有统计学意义(P <0.05),观察期间便秘改善的持续时间,结肠水疗组明显长于传统灌肠组(P <0.05),且前者的生活满意度明显高于后者。结论结肠水疗能促进结肠蠕动,调X肠道菌群失调,持久地改善便秘,是一种纯物理自然疗法。
目的:分析結腸水療與傳統弔袋灌腸治療功能性便祕(FC)的效果和療效持續時間№總結護理體會。方法將65例 FC 患者隨機分為結腸水療組(34例)和傳統灌腸組(31例),前組應用 GCJ-K 型電腦灌腸機進行水療,後組使用傳統灌腸袋行大量不保留灌腸,併分彆輔以相應的護理;觀察2組患者便祕改善情況,併運用便祕患者生活質量問捲(PAC-QOL)積分比較,評價治療效果和療效持續時間。結果結腸水療組有效率91.2%,傳統灌腸組有效率61.3%,2者差異有統計學意義(P <0.05),觀察期間便祕改善的持續時間,結腸水療組明顯長于傳統灌腸組(P <0.05),且前者的生活滿意度明顯高于後者。結論結腸水療能促進結腸蠕動,調X腸道菌群失調,持久地改善便祕,是一種純物理自然療法。
목적:분석결장수료여전통조대관장치료공능성편비(FC)적효과화료효지속시간№총결호리체회。방법장65례 FC 환자수궤분위결장수료조(34례)화전통관장조(31례),전조응용 GCJ-K 형전뇌관장궤진행수료,후조사용전통관장대행대량불보류관장,병분별보이상응적호리;관찰2조환자편비개선정황,병운용편비환자생활질량문권(PAC-QOL)적분비교,평개치료효과화료효지속시간。결과결장수료조유효솔91.2%,전통관장조유효솔61.3%,2자차이유통계학의의(P <0.05),관찰기간편비개선적지속시간,결장수료조명현장우전통관장조(P <0.05),차전자적생활만의도명현고우후자。결론결장수료능촉진결장연동,조X장도균군실조,지구지개선편비,시일충순물리자연요법。
Objective To analyze the effect and duration of colon hydrotherapy and the traditional enema in functional constipation (FC)patients and to summarize the nursing experi-ence.Methods A total of 65 FC patients were randomly divided into colon hydrotherapy group with 34 cases and traditional enema group with 31 cases.The hydrotherapy group received hy-drotherapy with GCJ-K type computer enema machine while the traditional enema group received a great deal no-retention enema with tradition enema bag.The two groups received corresponding nursing respectively.The constipation improvement of the two groups was observed and the PAC-QOL was applied to evaluate the treatment effect and duration of efficacy.Results The effec-tive rate was 91.2% in the colon hydrotherapy group and 61.3% in the traditional enema group, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05).The duration of constipation improvement in the colon hydrotherapy group was obviously longer than that in the traditional enema group (P <0.05).Besides,the life satisfaction in the colon hydrotherapy group was obviously higher than that in the traditional enema group.Conclusion The colon hydrotherapy can promote the colon peristalsis,adjust the intestinal flora and improve the constipation continuously,so it is natural and physical therapy.