CAJ | 학술논문

目的分析国内外执业药师资格考试样卷试题特点,为中国执业药师考试改革提供借鉴.方法采用Excel软件对美国(California Pharmacist Jurisprudence Exam,CPJE)考试[11]、英国药师注册评估考试、澳大利亚药师考试样卷的情景性、能力测试类型、药学服务环节、信息反馈对象及药学知识点等试题特点进行分类统计与分析比较,并与中国执业药师资格考试试题特点进行比较.结果 3份国外执业药师资格考试样卷的试题以有场景的情景题为主,均占50％以上,考核记忆能力的试题较少,占0.18％;以考核药学知识的应用能力实践型试题为多(均占60％以上),考题覆盖药学服务的各个环节;考题内容大都针对药学服务的对象(均占60％以上),而中国执业药师资格考试基本没有信息反馈对象;国内外试题大都有药事管理和法规(多占20％以上),所不同的是其他知识点国外试卷考核临床药物治疗学的内容(均占90％以上),而中国试卷考核为药物分析和药剂学的理论(41.97％).结论中国执业药师资格考试忽视药学知识应用能力考核,不能显现考生药学服务的水平,迫切需要改革.
목적 분석국내외집업약사자격고시양권시제특점,위중국집업약사고시개혁제공차감.방법 채용Excel연건대미국(California Pharmacist Jurisprudence Exam,CPJE)고시[11]、영국약사주책평고고시、오대리아약사고시양권적정경성、능력측시류형、약학복무배절、신식반궤대상급약학지식점등시제특점진행분류통계여분석비교,병여중국집업약사자격고시시제특점진행비교.결과 3빈국외집업약사자격고시양권적시제이유장경적정경제위주,균점50％이상,고핵기억능력적시제교소,점0.18％;이고핵약학지식적응용능력실천형시제위다(균점60％이상),고제복개약학복무적각개배절;고제내용대도침대약학복무적대상(균점60％이상),이중국집업약사자격고시기본몰유신식반궤대상;국내외시제대도유약사관리화법규(다점20％이상),소불동적시기타지식점국외시권고핵림상약물치료학적내용(균점90％이상),이중국시권고핵위약물분석화약제학적이론(41.97％).결론 중국집업약사자격고시홀시약학지식응용능력고핵,불능현현고생약학복무적수평,박절수요개혁.
Objective To compare the contents and features of licensed pharmacist qualification examination papers between those in abroad and domestic in order to provide the informations for the reforming the examination in our country.Method The characteristics of licensed pharmacist qualification examination among USA、UK、Australia and China were analysed and compared with classified statistic by using excel software.Results The scene questions are the main type in the three examination papers(＞50％).There were fewer questions examining the memory ability of examinees in abroad examinations,than that of ours.There were one question just had objects of pharmaceutical care (0.18％) in our examination.In the inspection of pharmaceutical knowledge application ability for the practice test(＞60％),covering all aspects of pharmaceutical care; And Chinese licensed pharmacists exam basic no object and pharmaceutical care link information feedback(＞60％),and the others are theoretical knowledge(＞20％).And in the three abroad examinations other common questions were about clinical drug therapy (＞90％),while they were the knowledge of pharmaceutical analysis and pharmaceutics in domestic examination papers (41.97％).Conclusion Licensed pharmacist qualification examination in our country ignored the ability of employing pharmaceutical knowledge and developing pharmaceutical care.The reformation of the licensed pharmacist qualification examination in our country is extremely urgent.