CAJ | 학술논문

目的初步研究适用于中国医学院校教师对临床医学专业课程整合态度的测量工具.方法利用文献法、专家访谈法,设计教师对临床医学专业课程整合态度调查问卷.运用因子分析法和Pearson相关系数评价结构效度;用内容效度指数I-CVI及S-CVI评价内容效度;用Cronbach alpha系数、分半信度评价其信度.结果因子分析提取3个主成分解释总变异的59.219％,旋转后因子1-3分别定义为对临床医学专业课程整合的价值认同、参与意向、情感倾向.3个因子和总问卷的Cronbach'sα系数分别为0.922、0.903、0.728和0.862.结论该测量工具的信度、效度可接受,可以为国内的类似评价提供参考.
목적 초보연구괄용우중국의학원교교사대림상의학전업과정정합태도적측량공구.방법 이용문헌법、전가방담법,설계교사대림상의학전업과정정합태도조사문권.운용인자분석법화Pearson상관계수평개결구효도;용내용효도지수I-CVI급S-CVI평개내용효도;용Cronbach alpha계수、분반신도평개기신도.결과 인자분석제취3개주성분해석총변이적59.219％,선전후인자1-3분별정의위대림상의학전업과정정합적개치인동、삼여의향、정감경향.3개인자화총문권적Cronbach'sα계수분별위0.922、0.903、0.728화0.862.결론 해측량공구적신도、효도가접수,가이위국내적유사평개제공삼고.
Objective A preliminary study was conducted on the measuring tool for teachers' attitude in the medical schools towards curriculum integration of medical program.Methods Literature review and expert interview were conducted to design a questionnaire which comprised 56 items to investigate teachers' attitude towards medical curriculum integration.The method of factor analysis and Pearson correlation coefficient were used to evaluate structure validity,the content validity index I-CVI and S-CVI were used to evaluate the content validity and Cronbach's alpha coefficient and split-half reliability were used to evaluate the reliability of the questionnaire.Results Three principal components were extracted by factor analysis,which explained 59.219％ of the total variance.After rotation,the factors 1-3 were respectively defined as value recognition,participation initiative and emotional tendency.Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the three factors and all the items is 0.922,0.903,0.728 and 0.862 respectively.Conclusion The reliability and validity of the measurement tool is acceptable,and can be used as a reference for similar domestic survey