CAJ | 학술논문

在近十多年以来，学界和相关管理部门公开发表的许多文章及讲话，认为我国学术期刊要“做大做强”，只能向欧美发达国家学习，要实行全面的市场化及国际化。但是仔细分析期刊市场与结构，可以发现这些呼声与建议所依据的论据并不充分，论证并不严密，不同类型的期刊，其实应选择不同的发展路径。多数的人文社科期刊和部分科技期刊，其实并不适宜走完全的市场化路径，采取一定措施保障其生存发展更为适宜。部分学术期刊，可以根据自身条件，调整办刊模式，与绝大多数的大众期刊一样，勇敢尝试走向“市场化”道路。
재근십다년이래，학계화상관관리부문공개발표적허다문장급강화，인위아국학술기간요“주대주강”，지능향구미발체국가학습，요실행전면적시장화급국제화。단시자세분석기간시장여결구，가이발현저사호성여건의소의거적론거병불충분，론증병불엄밀，불동류형적기간，기실응선택불동적발전로경。다수적인문사과기간화부분과기기간，기실병불괄의주완전적시장화로경，채취일정조시보장기생존발전경위괄의。부분학술기간，가이근거자신조건，조정판간모식，여절대다수적대음기간일양，용감상시주향“시장화”도로。
Over the past decade ,academia and related departments have published many papers and made numerous public speeches about how to learn from developed countries of European and A‐merican countries to carry out complete marketization and internationalization if our academic journals want to become bigger and stronger .However ,with a deep analysis on the market and structure of journals ,it’s easy to find the voices and suggestions listed above do not have sufficient rigorous evi‐dence .Different journals should have different path choices and most journals of humanistic social sci‐ence as well as some technical journals are not actually suitable for the marketization path ,but instead protective measurements should be taken .For some academic journals ,it is advisable to go the mar‐ketization path just like most public journals with a thorough research of itself and adjustment of their running models .