统计与信息论坛
統計與信息論罈
통계여신식론단
STATISTICS & INFORMATION TRIBUNE
2015年
4期
51-59
,共9页
自然可处置%管理可处置%径向DEA%经济效率%环境效率
自然可處置%管理可處置%徑嚮DEA%經濟效率%環境效率
자연가처치%관리가처치%경향DEA%경제효솔%배경효솔
natural disposability%managerial disposability%radial DEA%operational efficiency%environmental efficiency
分别利用结合环境管理策略的自然可处置和管理可处置径向DEA方法测度了中国大陆地区30个省、直辖市和自治区2000-2011年的合成效率得分。研究结果表明:中国东部地区经济效率和环境效率均显著高于其他两个地区;中部地区经济效率和环境效率则强于西部地区;东部地区“十一五”期间经济效率和环境效率相对于“十五”期间无显著变化;中、西部地区“十一五”期间经济效率相对“十五”期间显著下降,而环境效率并无显著变化。结合自然可处置和管理可处置环境管理策略,研究表明:东部地区应对更严格的环境管制拥有相对较低的机会成本,而中、西部地区为应对“十一五”期间更严格的环境管制不得不控制其经济增长的投入,从而导致经济效率显著降低。
分彆利用結閤環境管理策略的自然可處置和管理可處置徑嚮DEA方法測度瞭中國大陸地區30箇省、直轄市和自治區2000-2011年的閤成效率得分。研究結果錶明:中國東部地區經濟效率和環境效率均顯著高于其他兩箇地區;中部地區經濟效率和環境效率則彊于西部地區;東部地區“十一五”期間經濟效率和環境效率相對于“十五”期間無顯著變化;中、西部地區“十一五”期間經濟效率相對“十五”期間顯著下降,而環境效率併無顯著變化。結閤自然可處置和管理可處置環境管理策略,研究錶明:東部地區應對更嚴格的環境管製擁有相對較低的機會成本,而中、西部地區為應對“十一五”期間更嚴格的環境管製不得不控製其經濟增長的投入,從而導緻經濟效率顯著降低。
분별이용결합배경관리책략적자연가처치화관리가처치경향DEA방법측도료중국대륙지구30개성、직할시화자치구2000-2011년적합성효솔득분。연구결과표명:중국동부지구경제효솔화배경효솔균현저고우기타량개지구;중부지구경제효솔화배경효솔칙강우서부지구;동부지구“십일오”기간경제효솔화배경효솔상대우“십오”기간무현저변화;중、서부지구“십일오”기간경제효솔상대“십오”기간현저하강,이배경효솔병무현저변화。결합자연가처치화관리가처치배경관리책략,연구표명:동부지구응대경엄격적배경관제옹유상대교저적궤회성본,이중、서부지구위응대“십일오”기간경엄격적배경관제불득불공제기경제증장적투입,종이도치경제효솔현저강저。
T his study uses radial DEA methodology under natural and managerial disposability based on the environmental corporate strategy to measure the unified efficiency of 30 administrative regions in China during the period of 2000‐2011 . This study shows that both of the operational efficiency and environmental efficiency of the East are better than the other two regions and both of them in the Central are higher than the West w hile the operational efficiency and the environmental efficiency of the East show no significantly difference between the period of "11th five‐year" and "10th five‐year".The operational efficiency of the Central and the West show s significantly decline during the period of "11th five‐year"while there is no significantly difference between the period of "11th five‐year" and "10th five‐year" on environmental efficiency . The comparison combined with the environmental corporate strategy under natural disposability and managerial disposability shows that the East with relative lower opportunity cost w hen facing the more stringent environmental regulation w hile the Central and the West of China have to repress their inputs for the economic grow th w hich leads to the operational efficiency declined significantly at that case .