中华血液学杂志
中華血液學雜誌
중화혈액학잡지
Chinese Journal of Hematology
2015年
3期
206-209
,共4页
闫志凌%李振宇%张焕新%陈翀%李德鹏%邢伟伟%李护君%陈伟%程海
閆誌凌%李振宇%張煥新%陳翀%李德鵬%邢偉偉%李護君%陳偉%程海
염지릉%리진우%장환신%진충%리덕붕%형위위%리호군%진위%정해
血小板减少%地塞米松%利妥昔单抗%治疗结果%T淋巴细胞,调节性
血小闆減少%地塞米鬆%利妥昔單抗%治療結果%T淋巴細胞,調節性
혈소판감소%지새미송%리타석단항%치료결과%T림파세포,조절성
Thrombocytopenia%Dexamethasone%Rituximab%Treatment outcome%T-lymphocytes,regulatory
目的 观察大剂量地塞米松联合小剂量利妥昔单抗作为二线方案治疗原发免疫性血小板减少症(ITP)的疗效和安全性.方法 65例ITP患者纳入研究,其中糖皮质激素依赖52例、糖皮质激素无效13例;男35例,女30例,中位年龄34(18~70)岁.治疗方案:地塞米松40 mg/d,第1~4天静脉滴注,利妥昔单抗100mg,第7、14、21、28天静脉滴注.治疗前及治疗后12个月应用流式细胞术检测外周血调节性T细胞(Treg)、B淋巴细胞活化因子(BAFF)、IL-2、IL-10、可溶性白细胞分化抗原40配体(sCD40L).结果 全部65例患者治疗1个月时总有效率为81.5%(53/65),第3、6、12个月时完全反应率分别为72.3%(47/65)、66.2% (43/65)、63.1%(41/65).糖皮质激素依赖的52例患者治疗1个月时总有效率为90.3% (47/52),第3、6、12个月时完全反应率为80.8%(42/52)、76.9% (40/52)、73.1%(38/52).治疗12个月41例完全反应患者的外周血Treg细胞水平高于治疗前[(3.01±0.95)%对(1.69±0.35)%,P=0.032],BAFF、IL-2、sCD40L均低于治疗前[(648.03±79.63)ng/L对(972.35±93.64)ng/L,P=0.001;(2.84±0.32)ng/L对(4.18±0.46)ng/L,P=0.012;(4.55±0.66)ng/L对(7.73±1.04)ng/L,P=0.006],IL-10与治疗前比较差异无统计学意义(P=0.136).所有患者均完成了治疗,不良事件发生率为52.3%(39/65).结论 大剂量地塞米松联合小剂量利妥昔单抗对常规剂量糖皮质激素治疗无效或依赖的患者仍有较高的反应率,不良反应发生率可接受.
目的 觀察大劑量地塞米鬆聯閤小劑量利妥昔單抗作為二線方案治療原髮免疫性血小闆減少癥(ITP)的療效和安全性.方法 65例ITP患者納入研究,其中糖皮質激素依賴52例、糖皮質激素無效13例;男35例,女30例,中位年齡34(18~70)歲.治療方案:地塞米鬆40 mg/d,第1~4天靜脈滴註,利妥昔單抗100mg,第7、14、21、28天靜脈滴註.治療前及治療後12箇月應用流式細胞術檢測外週血調節性T細胞(Treg)、B淋巴細胞活化因子(BAFF)、IL-2、IL-10、可溶性白細胞分化抗原40配體(sCD40L).結果 全部65例患者治療1箇月時總有效率為81.5%(53/65),第3、6、12箇月時完全反應率分彆為72.3%(47/65)、66.2% (43/65)、63.1%(41/65).糖皮質激素依賴的52例患者治療1箇月時總有效率為90.3% (47/52),第3、6、12箇月時完全反應率為80.8%(42/52)、76.9% (40/52)、73.1%(38/52).治療12箇月41例完全反應患者的外週血Treg細胞水平高于治療前[(3.01±0.95)%對(1.69±0.35)%,P=0.032],BAFF、IL-2、sCD40L均低于治療前[(648.03±79.63)ng/L對(972.35±93.64)ng/L,P=0.001;(2.84±0.32)ng/L對(4.18±0.46)ng/L,P=0.012;(4.55±0.66)ng/L對(7.73±1.04)ng/L,P=0.006],IL-10與治療前比較差異無統計學意義(P=0.136).所有患者均完成瞭治療,不良事件髮生率為52.3%(39/65).結論 大劑量地塞米鬆聯閤小劑量利妥昔單抗對常規劑量糖皮質激素治療無效或依賴的患者仍有較高的反應率,不良反應髮生率可接受.
목적 관찰대제량지새미송연합소제량리타석단항작위이선방안치료원발면역성혈소판감소증(ITP)적료효화안전성.방법 65례ITP환자납입연구,기중당피질격소의뢰52례、당피질격소무효13례;남35례,녀30례,중위년령34(18~70)세.치료방안:지새미송40 mg/d,제1~4천정맥적주,리타석단항100mg,제7、14、21、28천정맥적주.치료전급치료후12개월응용류식세포술검측외주혈조절성T세포(Treg)、B림파세포활화인자(BAFF)、IL-2、IL-10、가용성백세포분화항원40배체(sCD40L).결과 전부65례환자치료1개월시총유효솔위81.5%(53/65),제3、6、12개월시완전반응솔분별위72.3%(47/65)、66.2% (43/65)、63.1%(41/65).당피질격소의뢰적52례환자치료1개월시총유효솔위90.3% (47/52),제3、6、12개월시완전반응솔위80.8%(42/52)、76.9% (40/52)、73.1%(38/52).치료12개월41례완전반응환자적외주혈Treg세포수평고우치료전[(3.01±0.95)%대(1.69±0.35)%,P=0.032],BAFF、IL-2、sCD40L균저우치료전[(648.03±79.63)ng/L대(972.35±93.64)ng/L,P=0.001;(2.84±0.32)ng/L대(4.18±0.46)ng/L,P=0.012;(4.55±0.66)ng/L대(7.73±1.04)ng/L,P=0.006],IL-10여치료전비교차이무통계학의의(P=0.136).소유환자균완성료치료,불량사건발생솔위52.3%(39/65).결론 대제량지새미송연합소제량리타석단항대상규제량당피질격소치료무효혹의뢰적환자잉유교고적반응솔,불량반응발생솔가접수.
Objective To observe the efficacy of high-dose dexamethasone in combination with low-dose rituximab as a second-line treatment for patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP).Methods 65 patients with ITP,previously by conventional dose of glucocorticoids,received high-dose dexamethasone in combination with low-dose rituximab (dexamethasone 40 mg/d for 4 days,rituximab 100mg,d 7,14,21,28 intravenous infusion).Treatment response,regulatory T cells (Treg),cytokines levels and treatment-related adverse effects were observed.Results Total response rate 1 month after treatment was achieved in 81.5% (53/65) of patients,and complete response at 3,6 and 12 months was 72.3% (47/65),66.2% (43/65),63.1% (41/65).The higher efficiency and complete response rate was achieved in preexisting glucocorticoid-dependent patients.For patients with complete response,Treg cells continued to show a high level state [(3.01±0.95)% vs (1.69±0.35)%,P=0.032],cytokines of BAFF [(648.03±79.63) ng/L vs (972.35±93.64) ng/L,P=0.001],IL-2 [(2.84±0.32) ng/L vs (4.18±0.46) ng/L,P=0.012],sCD40L[(4.55±0.66) ng/L vs (7.73±1.04) ng/L,P=0.006] significantly lower than that before treatment.The level of IL-10 was increased,but without significance compared with that before treatment (P=0.136).All patients completed the protocol with no serious adverse reactions.Conclusion The data show high-dose dexamethasone in combination with low-dose rituximab still has a satisfactory outcomes for patients previously with conventional dose of glucocorticoid.