广州大学学报（社会科学版）
廣州大學學報（社會科學版）
엄주대학학보（사회과학판）
JOURNAL OF GUANGZHOU UNIVERSITY(SOCIAL SCIENCE EDITION)
2015年
3期
77-82
,共6页
“说文四大家”%朱骏声%严可均%清代“说文学”%稿抄本
“說文四大傢”%硃駿聲%嚴可均%清代“說文學”%稿抄本
“설문사대가”%주준성%엄가균%청대“설문학”%고초본
Fout Big Sects of Shuowen%Zhu Junsheng%Yan Kejun%Shuowen of Qing Dynasty%manusctipts
“说文四大家”在说文学史上分量极重，“段、桂、王、朱”的形成有着深厚的历史渊源，然而清中叶亦有“段、桂、严、王”之判断。这两种看法的产生或因体例不同、或因著作时间早晚。朱骏声著作刊刻最晚，未入“说文四大宗”，一方面受到著作体例的限制；另一方面，其打破常规的编排方式，时人未识其善；而严可均未入“说文四大家”主要由于著作不能突破前人藩篱，仅对许书订正、修补。
“說文四大傢”在說文學史上分量極重，“段、桂、王、硃”的形成有著深厚的歷史淵源，然而清中葉亦有“段、桂、嚴、王”之判斷。這兩種看法的產生或因體例不同、或因著作時間早晚。硃駿聲著作刊刻最晚，未入“說文四大宗”，一方麵受到著作體例的限製；另一方麵，其打破常規的編排方式，時人未識其善；而嚴可均未入“說文四大傢”主要由于著作不能突破前人藩籬，僅對許書訂正、脩補。
“설문사대가”재설문학사상분량겁중，“단、계、왕、주”적형성유착심후적역사연원，연이청중협역유“단、계、엄、왕”지판단。저량충간법적산생혹인체례불동、혹인저작시간조만。주준성저작간각최만，미입“설문사대종”，일방면수도저작체례적한제；령일방면，기타파상규적편배방식，시인미식기선；이엄가균미입“설문사대가”주요유우저작불능돌파전인번리，부대허서정정、수보。
Fout Big Sects of Shuowen has the impottant position in the Shuowen’s histoty .Duan 段,Gui 桂, Wang 王 and Zhu 朱 have ptofound histotical otigins.In the mid Qing Dynasty thete was putpottedly Duan 段,Gui桂,Yan 严 and Wang 王,but this view otiginated ftom diffetent soutces ot styles ot was base on the diffetent ap-peatance time.Investigation may dtaw the following tough conclusion:Zhu Junsheng was not included into the Fout Big Sects of Shuowen because he fell behind it and his style did not comply with the Shuowen and also because his bteaking of the tules did not help him to be tecognized.Howevet,the failute of Yan Kejun 严可均 to be included into the Fout Big Sects of Shuowen could mainly atttibute to his incompetence to go beyond the styles of the ptevious wotks because what he did was just the cottection and tepait.
