中国卫生标准管理
中國衛生標準管理
중국위생표준관리
CHINA HEALTH STANDARD MANAGEMENT
2015年
10期
90-91
,共2页
商环%包皮环切%男性
商環%包皮環切%男性
상배%포피배절%남성
Shang ring%Circumcision%Male
目的:研究分析商环包皮环切术与剪刀法包皮环切术的临床疗效效果。方法选择2011~2013年我院接收的208例接受商环包皮环切术患者作为实验组,120例剪刀法包皮环切术患者作为对照组,对这些患者的临床手术治疗情况进行对比分析,探讨手术效果。结果实验组患者手术时间、术后疼痛、手术出血等情况优于常规手术患者,P<0.05。实验组患者切口边缘水肿和系带过短的发生率低于对照组,不良反应发生率也低于对照组,P<0.05。结论商环包皮环切术虽然愈合时间长,手术费用高,但是手术切口整齐,手术时间短,止血效果好,不良反应率低。
目的:研究分析商環包皮環切術與剪刀法包皮環切術的臨床療效效果。方法選擇2011~2013年我院接收的208例接受商環包皮環切術患者作為實驗組,120例剪刀法包皮環切術患者作為對照組,對這些患者的臨床手術治療情況進行對比分析,探討手術效果。結果實驗組患者手術時間、術後疼痛、手術齣血等情況優于常規手術患者,P<0.05。實驗組患者切口邊緣水腫和繫帶過短的髮生率低于對照組,不良反應髮生率也低于對照組,P<0.05。結論商環包皮環切術雖然愈閤時間長,手術費用高,但是手術切口整齊,手術時間短,止血效果好,不良反應率低。
목적:연구분석상배포피배절술여전도법포피배절술적림상료효효과。방법선택2011~2013년아원접수적208례접수상배포피배절술환자작위실험조,120례전도법포피배절술환자작위대조조,대저사환자적림상수술치료정황진행대비분석,탐토수술효과。결과실험조환자수술시간、술후동통、수술출혈등정황우우상규수술환자,P<0.05。실험조환자절구변연수종화계대과단적발생솔저우대조조,불량반응발생솔야저우대조조,P<0.05。결론상배포피배절술수연유합시간장,수술비용고,단시수술절구정제,수술시간단,지혈효과호,불량반응솔저。
Objective To study and analyze the operation effect of Shang ring circumcision and scissors circumcision. Methods 208 patients accepted the Shang ring circumcision were the experimental group,and 120 patients accepted scissors circumcision were the control group in our hospital from 2011 to 2013. And to analyzed the clinical operation treatment in these patients and to clinical operation treatment in these patients. Results The operation time, postoperative pain and operation hemorrhage in the experimental group were excel ent than these in the control group(P<0.05). Rates of incision edge edema,chalaza crosses short and adverse reaction in the experimental group were lower than these in the control group(P<0.05). Conclusion The Shang ring circumcision although need long healing time,the high cost of operation,but it has the neat operation incision,short operation time, good hemostatic effect and low adverse reaction.