中华行为医学与脑科学杂志
中華行為醫學與腦科學雜誌
중화행위의학여뇌과학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE AND BRAIN SCIENCE
2015年
3期
259-261
,共3页
刘娟%郭婷婷%崔丽霞%肖晶
劉娟%郭婷婷%崔麗霞%肖晶
류연%곽정정%최려하%초정
信息记录%感受记录%积极情绪%消极情绪
信息記錄%感受記錄%積極情緒%消極情緒
신식기록%감수기록%적겁정서%소겁정서
Information recording%Feeling recording%Positive affect%Negative affect
目的 探索不同日志记录方式对情绪体验的影响.方法 将75名大学生随机分配到信息记录组、感受记录组和对照组,在干预前、干预后及两个月的追踪期后对被试施以贝克抑郁量表(BDI)以及积极情绪和消极情绪量表(PANAS)评定.结果 对积极情绪的方差分析结果表明,时间主效应不显著(P＞0.05),组别[(2.76±0.41)分,(2.97±0.50)分,(3.24±0.45)分]主效应显著(P＜0.05),时间段×组别交互作用显著(P＜0.05),简单效应分析表明干预后信息记录组[(2.47±0.62)分]和感受记录组[(2.86±0.64)分]的积极情绪均显著低于对照组[(3.35±0.46)分](P＜0.05);消极情绪的时间主效应、组别主效应及交互作用均差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05);抑郁水平[(8.02±5.65)分,(5.38±5.04)分,(5.20±5.51)分]的时间主效应显著(P＜0.01),组别主效应和交互作用都不显著(P＞0.05).结论 不同的日志记录法对被试的情绪体验有不同的影响.
目的 探索不同日誌記錄方式對情緒體驗的影響.方法 將75名大學生隨機分配到信息記錄組、感受記錄組和對照組,在榦預前、榦預後及兩箇月的追蹤期後對被試施以貝剋抑鬱量錶(BDI)以及積極情緒和消極情緒量錶(PANAS)評定.結果 對積極情緒的方差分析結果錶明,時間主效應不顯著(P＞0.05),組彆[(2.76±0.41)分,(2.97±0.50)分,(3.24±0.45)分]主效應顯著(P＜0.05),時間段×組彆交互作用顯著(P＜0.05),簡單效應分析錶明榦預後信息記錄組[(2.47±0.62)分]和感受記錄組[(2.86±0.64)分]的積極情緒均顯著低于對照組[(3.35±0.46)分](P＜0.05);消極情緒的時間主效應、組彆主效應及交互作用均差異無統計學意義(P＞0.05);抑鬱水平[(8.02±5.65)分,(5.38±5.04)分,(5.20±5.51)分]的時間主效應顯著(P＜0.01),組彆主效應和交互作用都不顯著(P＞0.05).結論 不同的日誌記錄法對被試的情緒體驗有不同的影響.
목적 탐색불동일지기록방식대정서체험적영향.방법 장75명대학생수궤분배도신식기록조、감수기록조화대조조,재간예전、간예후급량개월적추종기후대피시시이패극억욱량표(BDI)이급적겁정서화소겁정서량표(PANAS)평정.결과 대적겁정서적방차분석결과표명,시간주효응불현저(P＞0.05),조별[(2.76±0.41)분,(2.97±0.50)분,(3.24±0.45)분]주효응현저(P＜0.05),시간단×조별교호작용현저(P＜0.05),간단효응분석표명간예후신식기록조[(2.47±0.62)분]화감수기록조[(2.86±0.64)분]적적겁정서균현저저우대조조[(3.35±0.46)분](P＜0.05);소겁정서적시간주효응、조별주효응급교호작용균차이무통계학의의(P＞0.05);억욱수평[(8.02±5.65)분,(5.38±5.04)분,(5.20±5.51)분]적시간주효응현저(P＜0.01),조별주효응화교호작용도불현저(P＞0.05).결론 불동적일지기록법대피시적정서체험유불동적영향.
Objective To explore the effect of different diary method on daily affect of college students.Methods 75 numbers of under-graduates were randomly assigned into information recording group,feeling recording group and control group.Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and Positive And Negative Affect Scale (PANAS) were used before and after two months intervention.Results For positive emotion,ANOVA results showed no significant (P＞0.05) main effect of time,a significant (P＜0.05) main effect of group(2.76±0.41,2.97±0.50,3.24±0.45),and the time × group had a significant interaction (P＜0.05).Simple effect analysis showed that after the intervention,the positive emotions of information recording group (2.47 ± 0.62) and feeling recording group (2.86±0.64) was lower than the positive emotions of control group(3.35±0.46) significantly(P＜0.05).For negative emotions,there was no significant difference (P＞0.05) in main effects of time,group and interaction;for depression,the main effect of the level of time (8.02± 5.65,5.38 ± 5.04,5.20± 5.51) was significant (P＜ 0.01),and main effect of group and the interaction were not significant(P＞0.05).Conclusion Different diary methods have different effects on the subject's daily affect.
