中医临床研究
中醫臨床研究
중의림상연구
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF CHINESE MEDICINE
2015年
7期
30-31
,共2页
网球肘%针刀%针刺
網毬肘%針刀%針刺
망구주%침도%침자
Tennis elbow%Knife%Acupuncture
目的：比较针刀与针刺配合艾灸对网球肘的治疗效果。方法：将86例网球肘患者用随机数字表法分成两组，其中针刀组43例，针刺配合艾灸组43例。对不同组别两个疗程后的疗效情况进行综合比较。结果：两组疗效率无显著差异（P>0.05）；两组进行等级比较，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论：针刀比针刺配合艾灸治疗网球肘疗效好。
目的：比較針刀與針刺配閤艾灸對網毬肘的治療效果。方法：將86例網毬肘患者用隨機數字錶法分成兩組，其中針刀組43例，針刺配閤艾灸組43例。對不同組彆兩箇療程後的療效情況進行綜閤比較。結果：兩組療效率無顯著差異（P>0.05）；兩組進行等級比較，差異有統計學意義（P<0.05）。結論：針刀比針刺配閤艾灸治療網毬肘療效好。
목적：비교침도여침자배합애구대망구주적치료효과。방법：장86례망구주환자용수궤수자표법분성량조，기중침도조43례，침자배합애구조43례。대불동조별량개료정후적료효정황진행종합비교。결과：량조료효솔무현저차이（P>0.05）；량조진행등급비교，차이유통계학의의（P<0.05）。결론：침도비침자배합애구치료망구주료효호。
Objective:To compare the knife with acupuncture plus moxibustion for tennis elbow. Methods:86 patients with tennis elbow were randomly divided into two groups, 43 patients took knife, 43 cases took acupuncture and moxibustion for 2 courses. Results:There was no significant difference at efficiency of the two groups (P>0.05); as for grade comparison, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion:knife acupuncture are better than acupuncture with moxibustion at tennis elbow.
