CAJ | 학술논문

目前学界存在大学英语教学到底应加强人文性还是工具性的辩论。我们对2000年以后 CSSCI 期刊上直接参与这场辩论的33篇文章进行了梳理和分析，结果发现：（1）双方的分歧在某种程度上来源于对对方观点的误解与以偏概全；（2）与其说两者针对对方，不如说他们针对的都是大学英语教学脱离思想和内容、仅重视语言技能训练的现状。我们提出，通过增设以英语讲授的内容性课程，可以有效改善这一现状，实现“人文性”与“工具性”的协同发展。
목전학계존재대학영어교학도저응가강인문성환시공구성적변론。아문대2000년이후 CSSCI 기간상직접삼여저장변론적33편문장진행료소리화분석，결과발현：（1）쌍방적분기재모충정도상래원우대대방관점적오해여이편개전；（2）여기설량자침대대방，불여설타문침대적도시대학영어교학탈리사상화내용、부중시어언기능훈련적현상。아문제출，통과증설이영어강수적내용성과정，가이유효개선저일현상，실현“인문성”여“공구성”적협동발전。
This paper offers an overview of the debate between “humanists”and “instrumentalists”on college English teach-ing.The humanists hold that College English teaching should lend itself more to the humanism education,whereas the instru-mentalists suggest that we ought to set a more instrumentalism -oriented goal for college English.Close analysis of the 33 papers published in CSSCI journals which were directly involved in the debate shows,however,that the discrepancies between the two parties partly come from misunderstandings.Instead of opposing to the viewpoints of each other,they actually both fire their criti-cisms at the current dominant practice of skill drill alone in college English teaching,which is neither humanism nor truly instru-mentalism.